2023, Volume 20, Issue 2
|
Marina V. Golomidova Reflection of Territorial Identity in the Toponymic Landscape of Small Ural Towns
Voprosy onomastiki, 2023, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 144–173 (in Russian) Received on 15 January 2023 Abstract: The paper discusses specific manifestations of territorial identity in urban toponymy. The authors consider the role of the cultural landscape in the formation, maintenance and transformation of territorial identity and the importance of the toponymic landscape in these processes. The novel approach of the research consists in broadening the explanatory framework and combining proper linguistic research methods with semiotic and culturological interpretation of urban toponymy. An original version of a complex multi-vector structure of the toponymic landscape is proposed, including spatial-topographic, semantic, linguo-cultural, sociolinguistic, and memorative aspects. Applying a modeling method to the structure of the toponymic landscape, the authors identify the main components of the semantic field of territorial identity verbalized in urban toponymy. The first (linguistic) level of components suggests the types of motivational semantics that are relevant to render the social and cultural experience of a place. The second level, semiotics of space, explicates the semantic effects of urban objects’ location, their juxtaposition and co-location. The model is validated using the language material of Nevyansk and Kyshtym, two small towns whose history relates to the development of the Ural mining industry. Hence, the research highlights both common and specific local features in the toponymic reflection of the Ural identity. The Nevyansk toponymic landscape maintains the unity of the semantic field of local identity; its core is the remote history of the city. Contrastingly, the toponymic landscape of Kyshtym attests to the polycentricity of regional identity and multiple differential characteristics that form it. The results obtained allow improving the municipal toponymic policy of small towns towards a deeper and more consistent exhibition of their identity. Keywords: urbanonyms; toponyms; territorial identity; urban toponymic landscape; small towns of the Urals; Nevyansk; Kyshtym Acknowledgements References Alasli, M. (2019). Toponyms’ Contribution to Identity: The Case Study of Rabat (Morocco). Proceedings of the ICA, 2, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-2-3-2019 Alekseev, P. V. (Ed.). (2016). Natsional’naia identichnost’ v zerkale toponimii (Gornyi Altai) [National Identity Reflections in Toponymy (Gorny Altai)]. Gorno-Altaisk: RIO GAGU. Alekseev, P. V., Popov, A. V., Alekseeva, A. A., & Samasheva, N. E. (2016). Toponimy v peresechenii natsional’nykh identichnostei mnogonatsional’nogo regiona (na primere toponimov Beliashi i Dzhazator v Respublike Altai) [Toponyms at the Intersection of National Identities of a Multinational Region (Based on Toponyms Belyashi and Dzhazator in the Republic of Altai)]. Filologiia i literaturovedenie, 1. Retrieved from https://philology.snauka.ru/2016/01/1828 (accessed on 03.01.2023). Alisov, D. A. (2020). Kul’turnyi landshaft goroda, ili Nekotorye sposoby fiksatsii istoricheskoi pamiati v gorodskoi srede [The Cultural Landscape of the City, or Some Ways of Capturing Historical Memory in the Urban Environment]. In D. A. Alisov, & I. A. Selezneva (Eds.), Kul’turnye landshafty sovremennogo goroda [Cultural Landscapes of the Modern City] (pp. 4–21). Moscow: Institut Naslediia. https://doi.org/10.34685/HI.2020.54.38.001 Basik, S. N. (2018a). Imia i mesto: toponimicheskii palimpsest v geokul’turnom prostranstve [Name and Place: Toponymic Palimpsest in Geocultural Space]. Sovremennye problemy territorial’nogo razvitiia, 3, 1–15. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/imya-i-mesto-toponimicheskiy-palimpses... (accessed on 05.01.2023). Basik, S. N. (2018b). Kommodifikatsiia toponimii kak fenomen sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi i kul’turnoi geografii [Commodification of Toponymy as a Phenomenon of Socio-economic and Cultural Geography]. Geograficheskaia sreda i zhivye sistemy, 2, 59–70. Bitušíková, A. (2022). Transformations of Place, Memory and Identity through Urban Place Names in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 71(4), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.15201/hungeobull.71.4.6 Bystrova, T. Yu. (2022). Potentsial naslediia malykh industrial’nykh gorodov Urala: regional’naia spetsifika i metody aktualizatsii [The Legacy of Small Industrial Cities of the Urals: Regional Specifics and Means of Actualization]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University Press. Galaktionova, N. A. (2016). Sotsiokul’turnyi oblik regiona cherez prizmu toponimicheskoi politiki (keis Tiumeni i Naberezhnykh Chelnov) [Socio-cultural Image of the Region through the Prism of Toponymic Policy (the Case of Tyumen and Naberezhnye Chelny)]. Regionologiia, 1, 152–163. Golomidova, M. V. (2022). Gorodskie toponimy v aspekte transliatsii regional’noi identichnosti: keis goroda Ufy [Urban Toponymy as a Means of Manifesting Regional Identity: The Case of Ufa City]. Voprosy onomastiki, 19(1), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.1.008 Golomidova, M. V. (2023). Ekaterinburg — Sverdlovsk — Ekaterinburg: obraz goroda v dinamike toponimicheskogo teksta [Ekaterinburg — Sverdlovsk — Ekaterinburg: The Image of the City in the Dynamics of the Toponymic Text]. Slovo.ru: baltiiskii aktsent, 14(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2023-1-2 Golovneva, E. V. (2017). Regional’naia identichnost’ i identichnost’ regiona [Regional Identity and the Identity of the Region]. Izvestiia Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 3: Obshchestvennye nauki, 12(3), 182–189. Ilyin, D. Yu. (2016). Regional’nye toponimicheskie nazvaniia v turisticheskom diskurse [Regional Toponymic Names in Tourist Discourse]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 2: Iazykoznanie, 15(4), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2016.4.15 Isachenko, G. A. (2017). Opyt interpretatsii izmenenii kul’turnogo landshafta s pozitsii dinamicheskogo landshaftovedeniia [Interpreting Changes in the Cultural Landscape from the Standpoint of Dynamic Landscape Science]. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Ser. Geograficheskaia, 1, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2017-1-20-34 Karlova, E. V. (2015). Territorial’naia identichnost’ naseleniia v Tsentral’noi Rossii [Territorial Identity of the Population in Central Russia] (Doctoral dissertation). Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow. Kravchenko, N. K. (2012). Prakticheskaia diskursologiia: shkoly, metody, metodiki sovremennogo diskurs-analiza [Practical Discourse Studies: Schools, Methods, Methods of Modern Discourse Analysis]. Lutsk: Volin’polіgraf. Krivonosov, A. D. (2018). Verbal’nye komponenty geobrenda i verbal’nye tekhnologii geobrendinga [Verbal Geobrand Components and Verbal Geobranding Technologies]. In A. D. Krivonosov (Ed.), Brending kak kommunikativnaia tekhnologiia XXI veka: materialy IV Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (5–6 marta 2018 g.) [Branding as a Communication Technology of the 21st Century: Proceedings of the 4th All-Russian Conference (March 5–6, 2018)] (pp. 143–146). St Petersburg: Izd-vo SPbGEU. Kuznetsova, A. V., & Petrulevich, I. A. (2021). Semiozis toponimiki v prostranstve gorodskoi identichnosti [Semiosis of Toponymy in the Space of Urban Identity]. Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 89(6), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.18522/2070-1403-2021-89-6-72-78 Light, D., & Young, C. (2018). The politics of toponymic continuity: The limits of change and the ongoing lives of street names. In R. Rose-Redwood, D. Alderman, & M. Azaryahu (Eds.), The Political Life of Urban Streetscapes: Naming, Politics and Place (pp. 185–201). New York: Routledge. Lotman, Yu. M. (1984). Simvolika Peterburga i problemy semiotiki goroda [The Symbolism of St. Petersburg and the Problems of the Semiotics of the City]. In Yu. M. Lotman et al. (Eds.), Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Works in Semiotic Systems] (Iss. 18, pp. 31–43). Tartu: Tartu State University. Matveyev, A. K. (2008). Geograficheskie nazvaniia Urala: toponimicheskii slovar’ [Geographical Names of the Urals: Toponymic Dictionary]. Ekaterinburg: Sokrat. Mitin, I. I. (2022). Gorod kak palimpsest: ot istoriko-geograficheskoi metafory k semioticheskoi modeli territorial’nogo upravleniia [The City as a Palimpsest: from a Historical and Geographical Metaphor to a Semiotic Model of Territorial Administration]. Chelovek: obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty, 1, 108–125. Naumov, D. N. (2012). Regional’naia identichnost’ kak glavnyi faktor formirovaniia blagopriiatnogo brenda territorii (na primere KhMAO — Iugry) [Regional Identity as the Main Factor in the Formation of a Positive Brand of the Territory (the case of KHMAO — Yugra)]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 5, 393. Nora, P., Ozouf, M., Puymège, G. de, & Winock, M. (1999). Problematika mest pamiati [The Semantics of Memorial Places]. In P. Nora (Ed.), Frantsiia-pamiat’ [France–Memory] (pp. 17–50). St Petersburg: St Petersburg University Press. Okunev, I. Yu. (2018). Territorial’naia i prostranstvennaia identichnost’: kontseptualizatsiia bazovykh poniatii [Territorial and Spatial Identity: The Formation of Basic Concepts]. Sravnitel’naia politika, 1, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-1-18-25 Polyushkevich, P. O. (2017). Simvolicheskoe konstruirovanie territorial’noi identichnosti (na primere toponimiki Irkutska) [Symbolic Construction of Territorial Identity (with Reference to the Toponymy of Irkutsk)]. Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie, 11, 80–94. Popov, S. A. (2007). Regional’naia toponimiia kak faktor natsional’noi identichnosti [Regional Toponymy as a Factor of National Identity]. In S. S. Sulakshin (Ed.), Natsional’naia identichnost’ Rossii i demograficheskii krizis: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. [Russia’s National Identity and the Demographic Crisis: Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference] (pp. 597–600). Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert. Razumov, R. V., & Goryaev, S. O. (2020). Transliatsiia regional’noi identichnosti v urbanonimii rossiiskikh gorodov: sovremennoe sostoianie [Manifestations of Regional Identity in Contemporary Russian Urbanonymy]. Voprosy onomastiki, 17(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2020.17.2.024 Samtakova, K. B. (2015). Natsional’naia identichnost’ telengitov na primere toponimov v basseine rek Chuia, Chulyshman i Bashkaus [National Identity of the Telengits on the Example of Toponyms in the Basin of the Chuya, Chulyshman and Bashkaus Rivers]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniia, 6, 330–331. Sandst, L. (2016). The Onomastic Landscape of Copenhagen — Meaning Formation, Rewriting History and Onomastic Scale Reduction. In C. Hough & D. Izdebska (Eds.), ‘Names and Their Environment’: Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of Onomastic Sciences (pp. 123–134). Glasgow: University of Glasgow. Shubina, T. I. (2006). Ulitsy Nev’ianska. Pamiati V. A. Zamotkina, kraeveda, pochetnogo grazhdanina g. Nev’ianska [Streets of Nevyansk. In Memory of V. A. Zamotkin, Local Historian, Honorary Citizen of Nevyansk]. In S. P. Postnikov (Ed.), Shestye Tatishchevskie chteniia [The 6th Tatishchev Readings] (Vol. 2, pp. 108–112). Ekaterinburg: Ural University Press. Stiperski, Z., Lorber, L., Heršak, E., Ptaček, P., Górka, Z., Kołoś, A., Lončar, J. et al. (2011). Identity through Urban Nomenclature: Eight Central European Cities. Geografisk Tidsskrift — Danish Journal of Geography, 111(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2011.10669532 Toporov, V. N. (1984). Peterburg i peterburgskii tekst [St Petersburg and St Petersburg Text]. In Yu. M. Lotman et al. (Eds.), Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Works in Semiotic Systems] (Iss. 18, pp. 4–30). Tartu: Tartu State University. Tóth, V. (2021). Linguistic Prestige and Toponym Use at the Crossroads of Languages and Cultures. Voprosy onomastiki, 18(3), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2021.18.3.033 Tucci, M., Ronza, R. W., & Giordano, A. (2011). Fragments from Many Pasts: Layering the Toponymic Tapestry of Milan. Journal of Historical Geography, 37(3), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2011.02.001 |
 |
