ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Bair S. Dugarov
Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies
of the Siberian Branch of the RAS
Ulan-Ude, Russia

Theophoric Names in the “Heavenly” Prologue of the Buryat Epic Cycle Geseriada

Voprosy onomastiki, 2021, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp. 110–122 (in Russian)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2021.18.3.036

Received on 28 January 2021

Abstract: Amongst other epic interpretations of religious mythology, the famous poems of Homer and Hesiod certainly rank the highest. Hesiod’s Theogony can be considered the most complete and consistent source on the history and genealogy of the Greek gods, as well as the theophoric naming tradition related to the Olympic pantheon. Typologically, the same can be said about the Buryat epic cycle Geseriada which has a detailed prologue in each of its variants, describing the world of the higher deities of Buryat mythology or Tengris (from the Turkic-Mongolian Tengri ‘heaven, celestial’) in connection with the main character’s heavenly genesis. It brings to our attention the names of the celestials as such, totaling to a symbolic sacred number of 99 deities, of which (according to the dualistic principle) 55 are western gods, 44 are eastern ones. This paper gives the first look on the most characteristic theonyms within the pantheon, reflecting its uranic backbone and structure and also communicating the essence of this deity through its meaning and etymology. For example, the names suggest the importance of the large clan if the thunderstorm tengris, led by Huhedei Mergen ‘Heavenly Shooter,’ whose name reflects the status of the Thunderer. It should be noted that many epithets of Tengris have later evolved into separate name variants. In this vein, the epithets altan ‘golden,’ shara ‘yellow,’ dulete ‘fiery’ indicate their belonging to the class of solar deities. The most archaic layer of names associates with the eastern gods of matriarchal origin, attributed to the celestials of the older generation. There are also Turkic names in the pantheon, most likely, dating back to the ancient times of the Turkic-Mongolian ethnolinguistic community.

Keywords: theonyms; prologue of Geseriada; mythological pantheon; Buryat mythology; cult of heaven; tengri; sacred tradition.

References

Bertagaev, T. A. (1971). Vnutrenniaia rekonstruktsiia i etimologiia slov v altaiskikh iazykakh [Internal Reconstruction and Etymology of Words in the Altaic Languages]. In O. P. Sunik (Ed.), Problemy obshchnosti altaiskikh iazykov [Problems of the Commonality of the Altaic Languages] (pp. 100–107). Leningrad: Nauka.

Bertagaev, T. A. (1974). Kosmogonicheskie predstavleniia v mifologii mongol’skikh plemen [Cosmogonic Concepts in the Mythology of the Mongol Tribes]. In B. G. Gafurov (Ed.), Istoriko-filologicheskie issledovaniia: sb. st. pamiati akad. N. I. Konrada [Historical and Philological Research: Collected Papers in Memory of Nikolai Konrad] (pp. 406–418). Moscow: Nauka.

Dugarov, B. S. (2004). K sakral’noi onomastike buriatskoi Geseriady (Khamkhir Bogdo) [On Sacred Onomastics of the Buryat Geseriada (Hamkhir Bogdo)]. Vestnik Buriatskogo universiteta. Ser. 6: Filologiia, 8, 3–10.

Dugarov, B. S. (2005). Buriatskaia Geseriada: nebesnyi prolog i mir epicheskikh bozhestv [Buryat Geseriada: A Heavenly Prologue and the World of Epic Deities]. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN.

Dyakonov, I. M. (1990). Arkhaicheskie mify Vostoka i Zapada [Archaic Myths of the East and West]. Moscow: Nauka.

Freidenberg, O. M. (1936). Poetika siuzheta i zhanra: period antichnoi literatury [Poetics of Plot and Genre: Ancient Literature]. Leningrad: Goslitizdat.

Freidenberg, O. M. (1978). Mif i literatura drevnosti [Ancient Myth and Literature]. Moscow: Nauka.

Gordlevsky, V. A. (1961). Izbrannye sochineniia [Selected Works] (Vol. 2). Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura.

Hübner, K. (1996). Istina mifa [The Truth of Myth]. Moscow: Respublika.

Khangalov, M. N. (1958). Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works] (Vol. 1). Ulan-Ude: Buriat. kn. izd-vo.

Konovalov, P. B. (1999). Etnicheskie aspekty istorii Tsentral’noi Azii (drevnost’ i srednevekov’e) [Ethnic Aspects of the History of Central Asia (Antiquity and the Middle Ages)]. Ulan-Ude: Izd-vo BNTs SO RAN.

Kramer, S. N. (1977). Mifologiia Shumera i Akkada [Sumer and Akkad Mythology]. In V. A. Yakobson (Ed.), Mifologii drevnego mira [Ancient Mythologies] (pp. 122–160). Moscow: Nauka.

Lord, A. B. (1994). Skazitel’ [The Storyteller]. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura.

Manzhigeev, I. A. (1978). Buriatskie shamanisticheskie i doshamanisticheskie terminy [Buryat Shamanistic and Pre-shamanistic Terms]. Moscow: Nauka.

Mikhailov, T. M. (1980). Iz istorii buriatskogo shamanizma [From the History of Buryat Shamanism]. Novosibirsk: Nauka.

Neklyudov, S. Yu. (1978). Problemy istoricheskoi evoliutsii mongol’skoi mifologii [Problems of the Historical Evolution of Mongolian Mythology]. In E. A. Serebriakov, O. L. Fishman, & M. E. Shneider (Eds.), Teoreticheskie problemy izucheniia literatur Dal’nego Vostoka [Theoretical Problems of Studying the Literatures of the Far East] (pp. 232–239). Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura.

Neklyudov, S. Yu. (1980). Zametki o mifologicheskoi i fol’klorno-epicheskoi simvolike u mongol’skikh narodov: simvolika zolota [Notes on Mythological and Folkloric-Epic Symbolism among the Mongol Peoples: The Symbolism of Gold]. Etnografia Polska, 24, 65–94.

Neveleva, S. Yu. (1975). Mifologiia drevneindiiskogo eposa (panteon) [Mythology of the Ancient Indian Epic (Pantheon)]. Moscow: Nauka.

Rabinovich, E. G. (1975). Afrodita Uraniia i Afrodita Pandemos [Aphrodite Urania and Aphrodite Pandemos]. In L. A. Freiberg (Ed.), Antichnost’ i Vizantiia [Antiquity and Byzantium] (pp. 306–318). Moscow: Nauka.

Rabinovich, E. G. (1995). Bogi Gretsii [Greek Gods]. In E. Rabinovich (Trans.), Gomerovy gimny [Homeric Hymns] (pp. 3–31). Moscow: Carte Blanche.

Toporov, V. N. (1997). Ob “ektropicheskom” prostranstve poezii (poet i tekst v ikh edinstve) [On the “Ectropic” Space of Poetry (Poet and Text in their Unity)]. In V. P. Neroznak (Ed.), Russkaia slovesnost’. Ot teorii slovesnosti k strukture teksta [Russian Literature. From the Theory of Literature to the Structure of the Text] (pp. 213–226). Moscow: Academia.

Vladimirtsov, B. Ya. (1927). Etnologo-lingvisticheskie issledovaniia v Urge, Urginskom i Kenteiskom raionakh [Ethnological and Linguistic Research in Yurga, Yurginsky and Kentai Districts]. Severnaia Mongoliia — II: predvaritel’nye otchety lingvisticheskoi i arkheologicheskoi ekspeditsii o rabotakh, proizvedennykh v 1925 g. [Northern Mongolia — 2: Preliminary Reports of the Linguistic and Archaeological Expedition on the Work Carried out in 1925] (pp. 1–42). Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR.