ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Vladislava V. Warditz
University of Potsdam
Potsdam, Germany

Russian Name-Giving of the New Time: Socio-Cultural and Political Ideological Mechanisms of Anthroponymic Shifts

Voprosy onomastiki, 2019, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp. 129–144 (in Russian)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.2.018

Received 9 March 2018

Abstract: The author stems from the premise that modern anthroponymy effectively incorporates data from related fields of knowledge, primarily those of cultural and political history, thus getting enlarged through interdisciplinary research. An integrated approach allows one to deduce the extra-linguistic mechanisms which lay behind anthroponymic changes. In the same vein, the present paper focuses on the dynamics within the Russian anthroponymic paradigm caused by the changing vectors of political, ideological, cultural, and religious identity in the historical perspective of the New Time (1700–1920s). The study aims to establish the connection between specific trends in naming and the precedent names, events, and texts of political, cultural, and religious life. The mechanisms of anthroponymic shifts are illustrated by the cases of individual names becoming socially significant in a particular historical context. Using interdisciplinary methods of cultural anthropology, the study builds on textual sources, primarily name indexes to the collections of works by outstanding cultural figures and scholars, and biographical dictionaries. Some examples of pragmatic naming strategies in works of art (literature, opera, cinema) are also provided. Preliminary findings reveal some major trends in the Russian anthroponymic system of the New Age such as Europeization vs. Russification, modernization vs. archaization, as well as their synthesis. These tendencies remain key up to the present day and can be traced and characteristically defined within a set (or corpus) of names relating to the particular epoch, in terms of their frequency and the parameters of the sociolinguistic distribution. The diachronic perspective of the study also supports the sociolinguistic observation that the newly introduced names, which are currently in use, have a pronounced social resonance, which is getting neutralized as their frequency increases. Further development of the topic implies, among other things, statistical verification of preliminary findings.

Keywords: Russian name giving, causes of anthroponymic shifts, Europeization, archaization, New Time, cultural paradigm, identity.

References

Ankenbrand, K. (2013). Höflichkeit im Wandel. Entwicklungen und Tendenzen in der Höflichkeitspraxis und dem laienlinguistischen Höflichkeitsverständnis der bundesdeutschen Sprachgemeinschaft innerhalb der letzten fünfzig Jahre (doctoral dissertation). Universität Heidelberg.

Berezovich, E. L. (2000). Russkaia toponimiia v etnolingvisticheskom aspekte [Russian Toponymy in the Ethnolinguistic Aspect]. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.

Berezovich, E. L. (2005). [Rets. na]: Imenoslov. Zametki po istoricheskoi semantike imeni [Review of: Imenoslov: Notes on Historical Semantics of the Name (Review)]. Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 2, 168–172.

Brendler, S. (2008). Nomematik: identitätstheoretische Grundlagen der Namenforschung (insbesondere der Namengeschichte, Namenlexikographie, Namengeographie, Namenstatistik und Namenstheorie). Hamburg: Baar.

Chernykh, P. Ya. (2002). Istoriko-etimologicheskii slovar' sovremennogo russkogo iazyka  [Historical and Etymological Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language] (Vols. 1–2). 5-e izd. Moscow: Rus. iaz.

Debus, F. (1988). Benennung und Sprachkontakt bei Eigennamen. Heidelberg: Winter.

Debus, F. (2008). Namenkunde und Kulturgeschichte. Beiträge zur Namenforschung, 43(3), 255–280.

Golomidova, M. V. (2005). Russkaia antroponimicheskaia sistema na rubezhe vekov [Russian Anthroponymic System at the Turn of the Century]. Voprosy onomastiki, 2, 11–22.

Kremer, D. (Ed.). (1999). Namensoziologie. Akten des 18. Internationalen Kongresses für Namenforschung, Trier, 12.–17. April 1993. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2004). Skol'ko khristianskikh imen moglo byt' u kniazia Riurikovicha? [How Many Christian Names Could Prince Rurikovich Have?] In L. A. Safronova, & M. V. Leskinen (Eds.), Oppozitsiia sakral'noe / svetskoe v slavianskoi kul'ture  [Sacred and Secular in Slavic Culture] (pp. 180–213). Moscow: Indrik.

Litvina, A. F., & Uspenskij, F. B. (2006). Vybor imeni u russkikh kniazei v X–XVI vv. Dinasticheskaia istoriia skvoz' prizmu antroponimiki [The Choice of the Name among the Russian Princes in the 10^th–11^th Centuries. Dynastic History in Anthroponymic Perspective]. Moscow: Indrik.

Matveyev, A. K. (2005). Onomastika i onomatologiia: terminologicheskii etiud [Onomastics and Onomatology: an Essay in Terminology]. Voprosy onomastiki, 2, 5–10.

Molchanov, A. A. (2003). Aleksandr: znakovoe imia v dinasticheskoi i kul'turnoi traditsii [Alexander: a Landmark Name in the Dynastic and Cultural Tradition]. In F. B. Uspenskij (Ed.), Imenoslov: Zametki po istoricheskoi semantike imeni [Imenoslov: Notes on Historical Semantics of Names] (pp. 103–111). Moscow: Indrik.

Naumann, H. (2011). Namen in Sprache und Gesellschaft: theoretische und methodische Probleme der Onomastik. Hamburg: Baar.

Pchelov, E. V. (2007). Antroponimiia dinastii Romanovykh: osnovnye tendentsii i zakonomernosti [Anthroponymy of the Romanov Dynasty: Main Trends and Patterns.]. In F. B. Uspenskij (Ed.), Imenoslov: Zametki po istoricheskoi semantike imeni [Imenoslov: Notes on Historical Semantics of Names] (pp. 299–344). Moscow: Indrik.

Pen'kovskii, A. B. (2003). Nina. Kul'turnyi mif zolotogo veka russkoi literatury v lingvisticheskom osveshchenii [Nina. A Cultural Myth of the Golden Age of Russian Literature in the Light of Linguistics]. Moscow: Indrik.

Shaikevich, A. Ya. (1996). Sotsial'naia okraska imeni i ego populiarnost' [Social Implication of the Name and its Popularity]. In N. N. Rozanova (Ed.), Poetika i stilistika. Iazyk i kul'tura. Pamiati T. G. Vinokur [Poetics and Stylistics. Language and Culture. In Memory of T.G. Vinokur] (pp. 265–280). Moscow: Nauka.

Smolnikov, S. N. (2005). Aktual'naia i potentsial'naia russkaia antroponimiia [Existing and Potential Russian Anthroponymy]. Voprosy onomastiki, 2, 23–35.

Trautmann, R. (1939). Die wendischen Ortsnamen Ostholsteins, Lübecks, Lauenburgs und Mecklenburgs. Neumünster: Wachholtz, 1939.

Trautmann, R. (1948–1949). Die elb- und ostseeslavischen Ortsnamen (Vols. 1–2). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Uspenskij, F. B. (Ed.). (2003). Imenoslov: Zametki po istoricheskoi semantike imeni [Imenoslov: Notes on Historical Semantics of the Name]. Moscow: Indrik.

Vasmer, M. (2003). Etimologicheskii slovar’ russkogo iazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language] (4th ed., Vols. 1–4). Moscow: Astrel’.

Warditz, V. (2013). Formy obrashcheniia v russkom iazyke diaspory kak markery «svoego» i «chuzhogo» [Forms of the Russian language within a Diaspora as Markers of “Friend” and “Foe”.]. In N. N. Rozanova (Ed.), Russkii iazyk segodnia. Vyp. 5. Problemy rechevogo obshcheniia [Russian Language Today.Vol.5. Problems of Speech Communication] (pp. 75–81). Moscow: Flinta.

Warditz, V. (2017). Aleksander Brückners Höflichkeitskonzept (1916): Linguistik oder Ideologie? Linguistische Untersuchung des sprachpolitischen Manifests eines Universalgelehrten. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 62(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/slaw-2017-0014.

Warditz, V. (2018). Bolgarskie oikonimy v drevnerusskoi onomastike X v.: k voprosu o putiakh toponimicheskoi transplantatsii [Bulgarian Oikonyms in the 10th Century Russian Onomastics: on the Ways of Toponymic Transplantation.]. In S. Kempgen, M. Wingender, L. Udolph (Eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 16. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Belgrad 2018 (pp. 341–352). Harrasowitz.

Zhivov, V. M. (2002). Razyskaniia v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul'tury [Searches in the Field of History and Prehistory of Russian Culture]. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul'tury.