ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Irma I. Mullonen
Institute of Language, Literature and History,
Karelian Research Centre of the RAS
Petrozavodsk, Russia

Phonetic Variants of the Ancient Toponymic Stem *Ylä- ‘Upper’ and Their Genesis in the Hydronymy of Karelia

Voprosy onomastiki, 2018, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp. 7–27 (in Russian)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2018.15.2.013

Received 4 November 2017

Abstract: The paper explores modifications of the ancient proto-Finnic toponymic stem *Ylä- ‘top, upper,’ attested in the hydronymy of Karelia and adjacent regions. The analysis aims to reveal its phonetic variants and their sources. It is observed that in hydronyms the stem is used both independently and in conjunction with some formants. The latter, originating from derivational suffixes and grammatical markers, have a strong tradition of usage evidenced by a number of discovered toponyms with markers having specific protolanguage features. For instance, toponyms like Ilinž/järv (-nžV < Proto-Saami *-ńće), Ylini/järvi (Finnic -ini), Yliz/järvi (Finnic -ize) showcase different stages of the development of diminutive / attributive suffix. The so-called superlative suffix, derived from the protolanguage superlative marker *-maηće/*-mäηće, along with its Saami and Finnic modifications, is attested in lake names such as Il’mozero, Ilemenza, Il’maž, Il’meza, Elimozero, El’mus, Ylimäine, Ylimäis/järvi etc. on the territory of Karelia and adjacent areas. It is proposed that the same logic applies to the origins of the Novgorod placename Ilmen. To underpin the attempted “upper” toponymic stems reconstruction, the study brings them in line with other place names derived from the stems with spatial semantics, formed with similar formant-types (e.g. lake Pelonč, Pil’masozero, Kukimasozero, Tarazmane). A certain areal distribution of naming patterns, apparently marking different ethno-linguistic groups, is also identified. Specifically, the pattern El’muz ~ Elimys known in the Central Karelia and west adjacent areas of Eastern Finland reflects the Late Proto-Saami linguistic condition. The pattern Ileksa, given its tight range between the lakes Lachа, Vozhe, Beloye, and Onega, as well as its phonetic appearance, may be an ancestry of an earlier language condition, associated with the Late Kargopol archaeological culture. The said culture’s areal quite accurately repeats the outlines of the toponymic range of Ileksa and some other toponymic patterns having a common Finnic-Saami and, in some cases, ancient western Uralic sources.

Keywords: Finnic languages, Saami languages, substrate toponymy, etymology, toponymic formants, toponymic stems, Karelia

References

Aikio, A. (2003). Suomen saamelaisperäisistä paikannimistä [Place Names of Saami Origin in Finland]. Virittäjä, 107, 99–106.

Aikio, A. (2007). The Study of Saami Substrate Toponyms in Finland. Onomastica Uralica, 4: Borrowing of Place Names in the Uralian Languages, 159–198.

Aikio, A. (2009). The Saami Loanwords in Finnish and Karelian (Doctoral dissertation). Oulu: [University of Oulu].

Hakulinen, L. (1968). Suomen kielen rakenne ja kehitys [Structure and Development of the Finnish Language]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.

Kabinina, N. V. (2011). Substratnaia toponimiia Arkhangel’skogo Pomor’ia [Substrate Toponymy of Arkhangelsk Pomorye]. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.

Kettunen, L. (1940). Suomen murteet. III.A. Murrekartasto [Finnish Dialects. III.A. Dialect Atlas]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

Korhonen, M. (1981). Johdatus lapin kielen historiaan [Introduction to the History of the Saami Language]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

Kosmenko, M. G., & Kochkurkina, S. I. (1996). (Eds.). Arkheologiia Karelii [Studies in Karelian Archaeology]. Petrozavodsk: KNTs RAN.

Kuokkala, J. (2012). Jälkitavun labiaalivokaalit saamessa ja itämerensuomessa [Second Syllable Labial Vowels in the Saami and Finnic Languages]. Helsinki: [s. n.].

Kuzmin, D. (2014). Vienan Karjalan asutushistoria nimistön valossa [Settlement History of White Sea Karelia in the Light of Onomastics]. Helsinki: Unigrafia OY.

Lehtinen, T. (2007). Kielen vuosituhannet. Suomen kielen kehitys kantauralista varhaissuomeen. [Thousands of Years of Language. The Development of Finnish from Proto-Uralic to Early Finnish]. Hesinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

Lehtiranta, J. (1989). Yhteissaamelainen sanasto [Common Saami Vocabulary]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.

Matveyev, A. K. (2000). Toponimicheskie poiski I [Toponymic Inquiries 1]. In A. K. Matveyev (Ed.), Finno-ugorskoe nasledie v russkom iazyke [Finno-Ugric Heritage in the Russian Language] (Vol. 1). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.

Matveyev, A. K. (2004–2007). Substratnaia toponimiia Russkogo Severa [Substrate Toponymy of the Russian North] (Vols. 2, 3). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.

Mullonen, I. I. (1994). Ocherki vepsskoi toponimii [Essays on Veps Toponymy]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Mullonen, I. I. (2002). Toponimiia Prisvir’ia: problemy etnoiazykovogo kontaktirovaniia [Toponymy of Prisvirye: Problems of Ethnolinguistic Contacts]. Petrozavodsk: PetrGU.

Nissilä, V. (1964). Pihtiputaan vanhaa nimistöä [Old Toponyms of the Pihtipuu Region]. In J. T. Lappalainen (Ed.), Pihtiputaan kirja [Pihtipudas Book] (pp. 71–100). Pihtipudas: Pihtiputaan kunta ja seurakunta.

Nissilä, V. (1975). Suomen Karjalan nimistö [Toponyms of Finnish Karelia]. Joensuu: Karjalaisen kulttuurin edistämissäätiö.

Popov, A. I. (1981). Sledy vremen minuvshikh. Iz istorii geograficheskikh nazvanii Leningradskoi, Pskovskoi

i Novgorodskoi oblastei [Traces of Times Long Gone. A History of Geographic Names of Leningrad, Pskov and Novgorod Regions]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Rahkonen, P. (2013). South Eastern Contact Area of Finnic Languages in the Light of Onomastics. Jyväskylä: Bookwell Oy.

Saarikivi, J. (2006). Substrata Uralica: Studies on Finno-Ugrian substrate in northern Russian dialects. Tartu: Tartu Univ. Press.

Sammallahti, P. (1988). Historical phonology of the Uralic languages with special reference to Samoyed, Ugric and Permic. In D. Sinor (Ed.), The Uralic languages. Description, history and foreign influences (pp. 478–554). Leiden; New York; København; Köln: E. J. Brill, 1988.

Smirnov, O. V. (2017). Osnovy so znacheniem ‘verkhnii’ — ‘nizhnii’, ‘malyi’ — ‘bol’shoi’ v substratnoi toponimii istoricheskikh merianskikh zemel’ [The Stems with the Meanings ‘Upper’ — ‘Lower’, ‘Little’ — ‘Big’, in the Substrate Toponymy of the Historical Merya Lands]. In E. L. Berezovich (Ed.), V sozvezdii slov i imen: sb. nauch. tr. k iubileiu M. E. Rut [In a Constellation of Words and Names: a Collection of Papers for M. E. Ruth’s Anniversary] (pp. 222–244). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-ta.

Sobolev, A. I. (2015). Geograficheskoe podtverzhdenie toponimicheskikh etimologii (na primere Iugo-Vostochnogo Obonezh’ia) [Geographic Evidence for Toponymic Etymology (with Special Reference to the South-Eastern Lake Onega Region]. In T. G. Ivanova (Ed.), Riabininskie chteniia — 2015: materialy VII konferentsii po izucheniiu i aktualizatsii kul’turnogo naslediia Russkogo Severa [Riabinin Readings — 2015: Proceedings of the 7^th Conference on the Study and Revitalization of the Russian North’s Cultural Heritage] (pp. 570–572). Petrozavodsk: muzei-zapovednik «Kizhi».

Tunkelo, E. A. (1946). Vepsän kielen äännehistoria [The Historical Phonetics of the Veps Language]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.

Zaitseva, N. G. (1981). Imennoe slovoizmenenie v vepsskom iazyke [Nominal Inflexion in the Veps Language]. Petrozavodsk: KarNTs RAN.