ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Guzaliya S. Khaziyeva-Demirbash
G. Ibragimov Institute of Language, Literature and Art of
the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan
Kazan, Russia

Healing-Protective Personal Names in the Traditional Tatar Culture

Voprosy onomastiki, 2017, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp. 72–83 (in Russian)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2017.14.3.023

Received 20 June 2017

Abstract: The article examines specific Tartar personal names which are supposed to protect children from disease, adversity, and death. Drawing on folklore and ethnographic data, the author distinguishes between the two main types: names that do not require any ritual, and those historically associated with some or other ritual actions. The first type includes “stopping,” “protective-wishful” and “averting” (“bad”) names; the second type is represented by personal names related to the rites of renaming or selling a child. As the author illustrates, Tatar native speakers believe that the former can “stop” death (such as Tuktamysh, Tuktar, Tuktasyn, etc. — derived from the verbal stem tukta ‘stop’) or protect the child, like the names with components timer ‘iron’ (Mintimer, Timerbay), bulat ‘steel’ (Aibulat, Bulat, Timerbulat), tash ‘stone’ (Biktash, Tashbai, Tashlyyar); the names with a negative meaning (like Sasyk ‘Smelly’, Yaman ‘Bad,’ etc.) are also considered to have protective impact. The latter type is exemplified, firstly, by names with the components min and cal meaning ‘birthmark’: Mielebulat, Migaleali, Milelebik; Kalpik, Kalystan, etc. — historically formed and often associated with the “ritual” renaming of the child. Secondly, the same type includes names reflecting the rite of “sale”: Satar ‘will sell,’ Satubal ‘buy,’ Satubaldy ‘bought,’ etc. As the article shows, all the considered varieties of Tatar healing-protective names have parallels in other Turkic languages, which means they may date back to the Old Turkic nominative patterns.

Keywords: Tatar language, Tatar culture, Tatar personal names, anthroponymy, healing-protective names, ritual of renaming a child, ritual of selling a child

References

Alishina, Kh. Ch. (1999). Istoriko-lingvisticheskoe issledovanie onomastikona sibirskikh tatar (na materiale Tiumenskoi oblasti) [Historical and Linguistic Study of the Onomasticon of Siberian Tatars (a Case Study from the Tyumen Region] (doctoral dissertation summary). Kazan: Tyumen State University, 1999.

Batyrshina, G. R. (2008). Terminologiia rodinnogo obriada bashkir (etnolingvisticheskii analiz) [Terminology of the Bashkirs Birth Rite (an Ethnolinguistic Analysis)] (doctoral dissertation summary). Ufa: IIIaL UNTs RAN, 2008.

Bayburin, A. K. (1993). Nechelovek — chelovek. Imianarechenie [A Human — and a Non-Human. On Naming Conventions]. In A. K. Baiburin, Ritual v traditsionnoi kul’ture. Strukturno-semanticheskii analiz vostochnoslavianskikh obriadov [Ritual in Traditional Culture. A Structural-Semantic Analysis of East Slavic Rites] (pp. 43–46). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.

Bikbulatov, N. V., Yusupov, P. M., Shitova, S. N., & Fatykhova, F. F. (2002). Bashkiry: Etnicheskaia istoriia i traditsionnaia kul’tura [The Bashkirs: Ethnic Hist ory and Traditional Culture]. Ufa: Bashkirskaia entsiklopediia.

Bondaletov, V. D. (1983). Russkaia onomastika [Russian Onomastics]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.

Foniakova, O. I. (1990). Imia sobstvennoe v khudozhestvennom tekste [Proper Name in a Literary Text]. Leningrad: LGU.

Gilfanova, F. Kh. (2005). Antroponimiia tobol’skikh i tiumenskikh tatar serediny XVIII–XIX vv. (k probleme etnicheskoi istorii) [Proper Names of Tobolsk and Tyumen Tatars in the Mid. 18th–19th Centuries]. Tyumen: Izd-vo Tiumen. un-ta.

Khadiev, I., & Merdenov, R. (2015). Mamadysh tebegenen tash"iazma isteleklere [Epigraphic Records of the Mamadysh Region]. Kazan: Tatar. kit. neshr.

Khisamitdinova, F. G. (2009). Lechebnaia i okhranitel’naia magiia bashkir (teksty) [Healing and Protective Magic of the Bashkirs (Texts)]. Ufa: IIIaL UNTs RAN.

Kibar, O. (2005). Türk Kültüründe Ad Verme: Kişi Adları Üzerine Bir Tasnif Denemesi [Naming in Turkish Culture: An Attempt at Proper Names Classification]. Ankara: Akçağ Basım Yayım Pazarlama A.Ş.

Kul’deeva, G. I. (2001). Antroponimicheskaia sistema sovremennogo kazakhskogo iazyka [The Anthroponymic System of the Modern Kazakh Language]. Kazan: DAS.

Kurbanov, A. (2014). Onomastiğin Esasları [Theoretical Foundations of Onomastics] (Vols. 1–2). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.

Kusimova, T., & Bikkolova, S. (2005). Bashkort isemdere [On the Name of Bashkortostan]. Ufa: Kitap.

Makhmud al-Kashgari (2010). Divan lugat at-turk (Svod tiurkskikh slov) [A Collection of Turkic Words] (Vols. 1–3). Moscow: Vost. lit.

Nadeliaev, V. M., Nasilov, D. M., Tenishev, E. R., & Shcherbak, A. M. (Eds.). (1969). Drevnetiurkskii slovar’ [Old Turkic Dictionary]. Leningrad: Nauka.

Nikitina, S. E. (2009). Lichnost’ i sotsium. Iazykovoi kollektiv i kollektivnaia iazykovaia lichnost’ [Personality and Society. Linguistic Collectivity and Collective Linguistic Identity]. In S. E. Nikitina, Chelovek i sotsium v narodnykh konfessional’nykh tekstakh (leksikograficheskii aspekt) [Man and Society in Folk Confessional Texts (A Lexicographic Aspect)] (pp. 10–15). Moscow: In-t iazykoznaniia RAN.

Petrov, L. P. (1988). Iz istorii chuvashskikh dokhristianskikh imen [From the History of the Chuvash Pre-Christian Names]. Sovetskaia tiurkologiia, 4, 21–25.

Safina, E. I. (Ed.). (2010–2016). Milli-medeni mirasybyz [Our National and Cultural Heritage] (Vols. 1–7). Kazan: IIaLI.

Şahin, İ. (2015). Adbilim (Çerçeve, Terim, Yöntem ve Sınıfl andırmalarıyla) [Onomastics (Scope, Terminology, Methodology and Classification)]. Ankara: Pigem Akademi.

Sattarov, G. F. (1990). Tatar antroponimikasy [Tatar Anthroponymy]. Kazan: Kazan un-ty neshr.

Tolstaya, S. M. (2008). Prostranstvo slova. Leksicheskaia semantika v obshcheslavianskoi perspective [Word Space: Lexical Semantics in the Slavic Perspective]. Moscow: Indrik.

Tolstoy, N. I. (1997). Izbrannye trudy. Slavianskaia leksikologiia i semasiologiia [Selected Works. Slavic Lexicology and Semasiology]. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury.

Toporova, T. V. (1996). Kul’tura v zerkale yazyka: drevnegermanskie dvuchlennye imena sobstvennye [Culture as Reflected in the Language: the Old Germanic Binominal Proper Names]. Moscow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury.

Ülkütraş, Ş. (1976). Türkiye Türklerinde Ad Verme İle İlgili Gelenek ve İnançlar [Traditions and Beliefs About Proper Names of the Turkish Native Speakers]. In B. Atalay (Ed.), I Uluslararası Türk Folklor Kongresi Bildirileri. IV cilt. [Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Turkish Folklore] (pp. 370–383). Ankara: Millı̂ Folklor Araştırma Dairesi.

Yudin, A. V. (1997). Onomastikon russkikh zagovorov. Imena sobstvennye v russkom magicheskom fol’klore [Onomasticon of Russian Charms. Proper Names in Russian Magical Folklore]. Moscow: MONF.

Zhanuzak, T. (2004). Esimder syry [The Mysteries of Proper Names]. Almaaty: Gilem.

Zhaparov, Sh. (2009). Adam attary — el bailygy [The Great Diversity of Proper Names]. Bishkek: Teknik.