ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Katalin Reszegi
University of Debrecen
Debrecen, Hungary

The Acquisition of Place Names in Mother Tongue Learning: Some Observations on Children’s Spatial Cognition

Voprosy onomastiki, 2016, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 7–22 (in English)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2016.13.2.015

Received 11 January 2016

Abstract: The paper reviews and complements existing knowledge about the acquisition of proper names. On the basis of research into children’s language, it seems obvious today that the process of acquisition of proper names (anthroponyms) is simultaneous to the acquisition of common nouns. However, the underlying mechanisms explaining the separation of the two groups of nouns are controversial. Compared to the case of anthroponyms, learning toponyms is a more complicated and a longer-lasting process. In connection with this topic, researchers dealing with spatial cognition are focusing on spatial orientation, on the localisation of spatial information in the brain and on spatial language. They study neither the way children get to know the wider geographical environment, nor the way they acquire toponyms. The author seeks to obtain more information about the beginning of this process based on the study of two small children’s toponymic knowledge in connection with their acquisition of geographical common nouns and the development of spatial orientation. This makes it possible to draw preliminary conclusions about the specificity of the cognitive mechanisms ensuring the knowledge of geographical environment. The author suggests that the meaning of early toponyms is typically undergeneralised — children tend to interpret the names of cities/towns or streets by restricting them to a certain house. It has also been made evident that, at the age of 2–4 years, the relationship between places and persons is very tight (for instance, children connect the names of places to specific persons). The semantic contingencies can be explained by the fact that, in the case of children, the place concepts themselves (what is a city/town?, what is a street?, etc.) have not been fully constructed yet, and that the elements of space are still not distinct entities.

Key words: Hungarian language, language acquisition, acquisition of proper names, place names, toponyms, spatial cognition, cognitive map, toponymic knowledge

References

Biel, A. (1986). Children’s Spatial Knowledge of their Home Environment. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 3(4), 2–9.

Budai, B. (2008). A téri tanulás folyamata – a mentális térkép (ki)alakulása [The Process of Spatial Aquisition: The Development of a Mental Map]. A Földrajz Tanítása, 16, 10–17.

Down, R., & Stea, D. (1977). Maps in Mind. London: Harper & Row.

Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, S. J., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in Early Communicative Development. Chicago, IL: Society for Research in Child Development.

Gelman, S. A., & Taylor, M. (1984). How Two-Year-Old Children Interpret Proper and Common Names for Unfamiliar Objects. Child Development, 55(4), 1535–1540.

Gopnik, A., Meltzhoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (2005). Bölcsek a bölcsőben. Hogyan gondolkodnak a kisbabák? [The Scientist in the Crib. How Do Babies Think?]. Budapest: Typotex.

Győrffy E. (2015). A helynévismeretről [On the Toponymic Knowledge]. Magyar Nyelvjárások, 53, 5–33.

Györkő E., Lábadi B., & Beke A. (2012). Téri viszonyok és a nyelvi reprezentáció a koraszülötteknél [Spatial Cognition and Linguistic Representation at Prematures]. Gyógypedagógiai Szemle, 2012/2. Retrieved from http://www.prae.hu/prae/gyosze.php?menu_id=102&jid=39&jaid=574.

Hall, D. G. (1991). Acquiring Proper Nouns for Familiar and Unfamiliar Animate Objects: Two-Year-Olds’ Word-Learning Biases. Child Development, 62(5), 1142–1154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01595.x

Hall, D. G. (2009). Proper Names in Early Word Learning: Rethinking a Theoretical Account of Lexical Development. Mind & Language, 24(4), 404–432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2009.01368.x

Hall, D. G., Burns, T. C., & Pawluski, J. L. (2003). Input and Word Learning: Caregivers’ Sensitivity to Lexical Category Distinctions. Journal of Child Language, 30, 711–729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903005749

Hennon, E. A., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., Rocroi, C., Arnold, K., & Hollich, G. J. (2002). From Proper Nouns to Categories: Infants Learn How Words Work. International Conference on Infant Studies. Retrieved from http://www.isisweb.org/view/0/brighton2002sun20.html.

Hoffmann, I. (1993). Helynevek nyelvi elemzése. [Linguistic Analisys of Toponyms]. Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetem Magyar Nyelvtudományi Tanszék.

Imai, M., & Haryu, E. (2004). The Nature of Word Learning Biases and Their Roles for Lexical Development: From a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In D. G. Hall, & S. R. Waxman (Eds.), Weaving a Lexicon (pp. 411–444). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Katz, N., Baker, E., & Macnamara, J. (1974). What Is a Name? A Study of How Children Learn Common and Proper Names. Child Development, 45(2), 469–473.

Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1996). “What” and “Where” in Spatial Language and Spatial Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Science, 16(2), 217–265.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Imagine of the City. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

MacWhinney, B. (2003). A nyelvfejlődés epigenezise. [The Epigenesis of Language Acquisition]. In C. Pléh et al. (Eds.), Kognitív idegtudomány [Cognitive Neurosciences] (pp. 505–527). Budapest: Osiris.

Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1997). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The Child’s Conception of Space. New York: Norton.

Reszegi, K. (2012a). A mentális térkép és a helynevek [Mental Map and Toponyms]. In J. Navracsics, & D. Szabó (Eds.), Mentális folyamatok a nyelvi feldolgozásban. Pszicholingvisztikai tanulmányok 3. [Mental Procedures in Language Processing. Studies in Psycholinguistics. 3] (pp. 95–100). Budapest: Tinta Könyvkiadó.

Reszegi, K. (2012b). Cognitive Approach to Hungarian Toponymy. Onoma, 47, 367–379.

Reszegi, K. (2015). A névközösség fogalmához [On the Concept of Name Community]. Helynévtörténeti Tanulmányok, 11, 165–176.

Reszegi, K. (2016). Cognitive Description of Multilingual Toponym Pairs. In C. Hough, & D. Izdebska (Eds.), Names and Their Environment. Proceedings of the 25^th International Congress of Onomastic Sciences, Glasgow, 25–29 August 2014 (Vol. 2, pp. 88–97). Retrieved from http://www.icos2014.com/wp-content/uploads/icos2014_v2_88.pdf.

Szépe, G. (1970). Kommunikációs és grammatikai megjegyzések a névről. [Communication and Grammatical Notes about Name]. In M. Kázmér, & J. Végh (Eds.), Névtudományi előadások. II. Névtudományi Konferencia 1969. Nyelvtudományi Értekezések 70 [The Second Conference on Onomastics, 1969] (pp. 307–311). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.

Tincoff, R., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1999). Some Beginnings of Word Comprehension in 6-Month-Olds. Psychological Science, 10(2), 172–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00127

Tincoff, R., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2000). Do 6-Month-Olds Link Sound Patterns of Common Nouns to New Exemplars? (Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Brighton, UK).

Tolcsvai, N. G. (2008). A tulajdonnév jelentése [The Meaning of a Proper Name]. In A Bölcskei, & N. I. Császi (Eds.), Név és valóság [Name and Reality] (pp. 30–41). Budapest: Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Magyar Nyelvtudományi Tanszéke.

Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychological Review, 55/4, 189–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0061626

Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two Cortical Visual Systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of Visual Behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge: MIT Press.