2025, Volume 22, Issue 2
|
Aleh Iharavich Kopach THE GRAMMAR OF TOPONYMIC CONSTRUCTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF ENACTIVISM: A METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
For citation Received on 31 October 2024 Abstract: This article proposes a methodology for the cognitive-grammatical analysis of geographical names, informed by the principles of enactivism. The approach rests on the hypothesis that toponyms encode spatial orientation patterns shaped through embodied human experience. The study draws on microtoponyms, oikonyms, and hydronyms from six historical-ethnographic regions of the Republic of Belarus (two districts in each). The theoretical framework integrates construction grammar, conceptual metonymy and metaphor theories. Within this framework, the toponymic system is organized around a primary reference point — typically the speaker’s place of residence — and is examined as a set of holistic constructions used to navigate locally meaningful space. Toponymic relations are described both vertically and horizontally, using recurring naming patterns found in speech. These patterns grow through recursive use across different spatial zones. Mapping names onto spatial reference systems reveals key reference points in toponymic space, identifies the basic model of the toponymic system, and the forms through which it is realized. These constructions become conventionalized in everyday speech, supporting orientation by reference to background landmarks, as well as descriptions of qualitative or possessive characteristics of objects. The presence of regularly formed, non-central toponyms, located at varying distances from the core but not linked into a single network, suggests a functional hierarchy within the system that supports orientation in distinct areas. The analysis of semantic extension within these constructions highlights the differing roles of metonymy and metaphor in the development of the system. The proposed methodology frames toponym creation as a human activity linking perception and spatial movement. It uncovers the spatial meanings of holistic toponyms, the recursive structure of their grammatical semantics, and the extent to which their functional status is determined by the location of their referents. Keywords: enactivism; construction grammar; microtoponyms; oikonyms; hydronyms; conceptual metonymy; conceptual metaphor; referential system; basic model of a toponymic system; spatial zone Acknowledgements The work of E. L. Berezovich was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant number 23-18-00439 Onomasticon and Linguocultural History of European Russia, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-18-00439/) The authors express their heartfelt gratitude to all who responded to the editorial questionnaire. References Bedash, Yu. A. (2014). Analiz prostranstva v fenomenologii Edmunda Gusserlia i Morisa Merlo-Ponti [The Analysis of Space in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiia. Sotsiologiia. Politologiia, 4, 211–218. Berezovich, E. L. (2009). Russkaia toponimiia v etnolingvisticheskom aspekte: prostranstvo i chelovek [Russian Toponymy in the Ethnolinguistic Perspective: Space and Man]. Moscow: LIBROKOM. Diessel, H. et al. (2015). Usage-based Construction Grammar. In E. Dąbrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 295–321). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Ermoshkina, G. F. (2022). Mikrotoponimiia Smolenskoi oblasti: geograficheskii aspekt [Microtoponymy of the Smolensk Region: A Geographical Perspective]. Geograficheskaia sreda i zhivye sistemy, 4, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.18384/2712-7621-2022-4-129-144 Fillmore, Ch. J. (2004). Idiomaticity. In Berkeley construction grammar. Retrieved from http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/lec02.html Fillmore, Ch. J., & Kay, P. (1999). Grammatical Constructions and Linguistic Generalizations: The What’s X Doing Y Construction. Language, 75(1), 1–34. Gasparyan, D. E. (2020). Fenomenologiia bez transtsendental'nogo sub"ekta: neirofenomenologiia i enaktivizm v poiskakh perspektivy ot pervogo litsa [Phenomenology without a Transcendental Subject: Neurophenomenology and Enactivism in Search of the First-Person Perspective]. Filosofskii zhurnal, 13(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2020-13-1-80-96 Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Heidegger, M. (2003). Bytie i vremia [Being and Time]. Kharkov: Folio. Kitchin, R. M. (1994). Cognitive Maps: What are They and Why Study Them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(1), 1–19. Knyazeva, E. N. (2014). Enaktivizm: novaia forma konstruktivizma v epistemologii [Enactivism: A New Form of Constructivism in Epistemology]. St Petersburg: TsGI Print. Kopach, A. I. (2020). Tapanіmіchnaia prastora Belarusі u kagnіtyunym aspektse (na materyiale nazvau topaab’ektau natural’nai namіnatsyі) [The Toponymic Space of Belarus in the Cognitive Aspect (Based on the Names of Naturally Nominated Topographical Features)]. Minsk: Belarusian State University. Kovlakas, E. F. (2021). K voprosu izucheniia toponimov v kognitivnom aspekte [On the Study of Toponyms from a Cognitive Perspective]. Sovremennye issledovaniia sotsial’nykh problem, 13(4/2), 326–354. https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-4-326-354 Kravchenko, A. V. (2022). Towards a Paradigm Change in Language Studies. Constructivist Foundations, 18(1), 63–68. Lakoff, G. (2004). Zhenshchiny, ogon’ i opasnye veshchi: Chto kategorii iazyka govoriat nam o myshlenii [Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind]. Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Leino, A. (2016). Place-names as Constructions. In S. Brendler (Ed.), Cognitive Onomastics: A Reader (pp. 103–123). Hamburg: Baar. Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (2006). Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O’Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 939–973. Popov, S. (2016). Metonimiia i metafora kak korreliaty dvukh etapov vynuzhdenno poverkhnostnogo vospriiatiia vozmozhnosti sozdat’ novoe leksicheskoe znachenie [Metonymy and Metaphor as Correlates of Two Stages of Forced Surface-Level Perception of the Possibility of Creating New Lexical Meaning]. Journal of Linguistics, 67(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/jazcas-2016-0009 Reszegi, K. (2022a). A Cognitive Approach in Onomastics: Some Notes on Metaphorical Placenames. Voprosy onomastiki, 19(1), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.1.012 Reszegi, K. (2022b). Metonymic Namegiving from a Cognitive Perspective. Acta onomastica, 63(1), 206–225. Reszegi, K. (2023). Proper Names in Cognitive Onomastics: Meaning and Categorization of Proper Names. Onomástica desde América Latina, 4, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v4i1.30589 Schlücker, B., & Ackermann, T. (2017). The Morphosyntax of Proper Names: An Overview. Folia Linguistica, 51, 309–339. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0011 Siegel, A. W., & Cousins, J. H. (1985). The Symbolizing and Symbolized Child in the Enterprise of Cognitive Mapping. In R. Cohen (Ed.), The Development of Spatial Cognition (pp. 347–368). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publishers. Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The Development of Spatial Representation of Large-Scale Environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior (pp. 9–55). New York: Academic Press. Stolz, T., Jacquesson, F., & Muysken, P. C. (Eds.). (2014). The Crosslinguistics of Zero-marking of Spatial Relations. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. Stolz, T., & Levkovych, N. (2020). Grammatical versus Onymic Classifiers: First Thoughts about a Potentially Interesting Topic. In N. Levkovych, & J. Nintermann (Eds.), Aspects of the Grammar of Names. Empirical Case Studies and Theoretical Topics (pp. 140–165). Munich: LINCOM Europa. Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
|
 |
