ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Blanca María Prósper
Marcos Medrano Duque
University of Salamanca
Salamanca, Spain

Ancient Gaulish and British Divinities: Notes on the Reconstruction of Celtic Phonology and Morphology

Voprosy onomastiki, 2022, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp. 9–47 (in English)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.2.015

Received on 18 November 2021

Abstract: The linguistic study of Celtic divinities attested on Latin inscriptions has proved instrumental in disclosing a number of facts about ancient religion, the relationship with the Roman rule, and the spread of indigenous or syncretic cults. In fact, minor divinities were worshipped on a local basis only, but even under such unfavourable circumstances they managed to become partly integrated in the religious system of the Roman Empire: they acted in the sphere of the higher gods for a time before they vanished for ever, and they must have been much more common than our fragmentary sources suggest. Crucially, the study of their names also provides priceless clues about the early stages of Celtic phonology and morphology, it also helps illuminate insufficiently known aspects of the evolution of Continental and Insular Celtic and their interaction with Latin. In this work, the authors focus on several hitherto misinterpreted Celtic divine names from Britannia (MEDOCIO, ARNOMECIE, BRACIACAE, ARCIACONI, COROTIACO) and Gaul (MEDVTONI, COBRANDIAE, CENTONDI, ROQVETIO, SINQVATI) and try to test their relative importance for Indo-European language reconstruction, distant cultural relationship of ancient populations, ancient religion with special attention to the interaction of major Roman divinities with minor Celtic ones, Latin and Celtic phonetics and morphology, loan phonology and the spread and adaptation of the Latin alphabet to write texts in the indigenous Celtic languages and foreign names in Latin epigraphy.

Keywords: Celtic languages, Gaulish religion, Celtic phonology, Indo-European onomastics, Indo-European word formation, Latin epigraphy, Latin alphabet, Celtic theonymy.

References

AE — Cagnat, R. et al. (Eds.). (1888–). LʼAnnée Epigraphique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Antonaccio, C. M. (1999). Kupara, a Sikel Nymph? Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 126, 177–185.

Antonaccio, C. M., & Neils, J. (1995). A New Graffito from Archaic Morgantina. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 105, 261–277.

Aski, J. M. (2001). Multivariable Reanalysis and Phonological Split. In L. J. Brinton (Ed.), Historical Linguistics 1999. Selected Papers from the 14^th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9–13 August 1999 (pp. 31–47). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Bateman, N. (2011). On the Typology of Palatalization. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00294.x

Blevins, J. (2008). Consonant Epenthesis: Natural and Unnatural Histories. In J. Good (Ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Change (pp. 79–107). Oxford: OUP.

Borréani, M., & Gascou, J. (1998). Le dieu Roquetius dʼaprès trois inscriptions de Cabasse (Var). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 121, 297–299.

Bosch, E. (1967). Quellen zur Geschichte der Stadt Ankara im Altertum. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınlarından.

Burnand, Y., & Lambert, P.-Y. (2004). Découvertes récentes dʼune inscription gallo-latine sur pierre à Nasium — Naix-aux-Forges (Meuse). Comptes-rendus des Séances de lʼAcadémie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 148e année, 2, 683–690.

Bybee, J., & Easterday, Sh. (2019). Consonant Strengthening: A Crosslinguistic Survey and Articulatory Proposal. Linguistic Typology, 23, 263–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0015

CAG — Carte Archéologique de la Gaule. 03: LʼAllier, 1989; 13-02: Les Alpilles et la Montagnette, 1999; 80-01: Amiens, 2009. Paris: Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres.

Calderini, A. (2001). Cupra. Un dossier per lʼidentifi cazione. Evtopia, 1, 45–129.

Casali, R. F. (2011). Hiatus Resolution. In M. Van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–27). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0061

Chase, G. D. (1897). The Origin of Roman Praenomina. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 8, 103–184.

CIL — Mommsen, Th. et al. (Eds.). (1862–). Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

CILCaceres-4 — Esteban Ortega, J. (Ed.). (2017). Corpus de inscripciones latinas de Cáceres. IV. Caurium. Cáceres: Ediciones Universidad de Extremadura.

Cotugno, F. (2015). I longa in iato nel Corpus Vindolandense. Studie Saggi Linguistici, 53, 189–206.

Cowgill, W. (1985). PIE *duo “2” in Germanic and Celtic, and the Nom.-Acc. Dual of Non-neuter o-Stems. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, 46, 13–28.

Cser, A. (2020). The Phonology of Classical Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society, 118, 1–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12184

De Bernardo Stempel, P. (1999). Nominale Wortbildung des älteren Irischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Delamarre, X. (2004). Gallo-Brittonica: transports, richesse et générosité chez les Anciens Celtes. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 54, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1515/ZCPH.2005.121

Delamarre, X. (2007). Noms de personnes celtiques dans lʼépigraphie classique. Paris: Errance.

Devine, A. M., & Stephens, L. D. (1994). The Prosody of Greek Speech. New York; Oxford: OUP.

DLG — Delamarre, X. (2003). Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise. Paris: Errance.

Dressler, W. (1967). Galatisches. In W. Meid (Ed.) Beitrage zur Indogermanistik und Keltologie Julius Pokorny zum 80. Geburtstag gewidmet (pp. 147–154). Innsbruck: Sprachwissenschaftliches Institut der Universität Innsbruck.

EDBIL — Derksen, R. (2015). Etymological Dictionary of the Baltic Inherited Lexicon. Leiden: Brill.

EDLIL — De Vaan, M. (2008). Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.

EDPC — Matasović, R. (2009). Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden: Brill.

ERL — Rabanal Alonso, M. A., & García Martínez, S. M. (2001). Epigrafía romana de la provincia de León: revisión y actualización. León: Universidad de León.

Ernout, A. (1971). Notes de philologie latine. Genève, Paris: Droz.

ERPS — Hernández Guerra, L. (2008). Epigrafía romana de la provincia de Salamanca. Valladolid: Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid.

ERS — Santos Yanguas, J., Hoces de La Guardia, A. L., & Del Hoyo, J. (2005). Epigrafía romana de Segovia y su provincia. Segovia: Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Segovia.

Eska, J. F. (2013). In Defense of Celtic /φ/. In A. I. Cooper, J. Rau, & M. Weiss (Eds.), Multi Nominis Grammaticus. Studies in Classical and Indo-European Linguistics in Honor of Alan J. Nussbaum on the Occasion of his Sixty-fifth Birthday (pp. 32–43). Ann Arbor; New York: Beech Stave Press.

Foulkes, P. (1997). Historical Laboratory Phonology — /p/ > /f/ > /h/ Changes. Language and Speech, 40, 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099704000303

Gamallo Barranco, J. L., & Gimeno Pascual, H. (1990). Inscripciones del Norte y Sudoeste de la provincia de Cáceres: revisión y nuevas aportaciones. Cuadernos de Prehistoria y Arqueología de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 17, 277–306.

Geogr. Rav., 2012 — Schnetz, J., & Zumschlinge, M. (2012). Itineraria Romana. Vol. 2: Ravennatis Anonymi cosmographia et Guidonis geographica. Berlin, Boston: B. G. Teubner.

Gotō, T. (2013). Old Indo-Aryan Morphology and its Indo-Iranian Background. Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.

GPN — Evans, D. E. (1967). Gaulish Personal Names. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Guyonvarcʼh, Ch.-J. (1964). Le nom des Quariates. Notes dʼétymologie gauloises et celtiques, 20. Ogam, 16, 428–429.

Hackstein, O. (2002). Uridg. *CH.CC > *C.CC. Historische Sprachforschung, 115, 1–22.

Haverfield, F. (1890). Roman Inscriptions in Britain, 1888–90. Exeter: William Pollard & Co.

Hourcade, D., & Maurin, L. (2013). Mars Grannus à Cassinomagus (Chassenon, Charente). Aquitania, 29, 137–153.

ILLPRON — Hainzmann, M., & Schubert, P. (1986). Inscriptionum Lapidarium Latinarum Provinciae Norici usque ad annum MCMLXXXIV repertarum indices. Berlin: De Gruyter.

ILN — Gascou, J. (1985). Inscriptions latines de Narbonnaise. Vol. 1: Fréjus. Paris: C.N.R.S.

Isaac, G. (2007). Studies in Celtic Sound Changes and their Chronology. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Jackson, K. (1953/1994). Language and History in Early Britain. Dublin: Four Courts Press.

Janssen, H.-H. (1956). Qu et gu en latin. In Hommages à Max Niedermann (pp. 184–190). Brussels: Berchem.

Jasanoff , J. (1997). Where Does Skr. bhávati Come from? In D. Disterheft, J. Puhvel, J. Greppin, M. Huld, & E. Polomé (Eds.), Studies in Honor of Jaan Puhvel. Part One: Ancient Languages and Philology (pp. 173–186). Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.

Jordán Cólera, C. (2010). [K.14.1]: Una nota de epigrafía paleohispánica. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 172, 155–158.

KGP — Schmidt, K.-H. (1957). Die Komposition in Gallischen Personennamen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Kölligan, D. (2014). O sufixo latino -dō e grego -δών: Origem e desenvolvimento. In M. Viaro (Ed.), Morfologia histórica (pp. 154–189). São Paulo: Cortez Editora.

Kulikov, L. I. (2000). Vedic Causative Nasal Presents and their Thematicization: A Functional Approach. In J. Ch. Smith, & D. Bentley (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 1995. Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995. Vol. 1: General Issues and Non-Germanic Languages (pp. 191–210). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Lejeune, M. (1971). Lepontica. Études Celtiques, 12, 357–500.

Lejeune, M., Fleuriot, L., Lambert, P.-Y., Marichal, R., & Vernhet, A. (1985). Le plomb magique du Larzac et les sorcières gauloises. Paris: C.N.R.S.

Lindeman, F. O. (2006). Gaulish Ambiorix. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 55, 50–55.

Lindsay, W. M. (Ed.). (1913). Sexti Pompei Festi De verborum significatu quae supersunt cum Pauli epitome. Leipzig: Teubner.

Lipp, R. (2009). Die indogermanischen und einzelsprachlichen Palatale im Indoiranischen. Band 1 : Neurekonstruktion, Nuristan-Sprachen, Genese der indoarischen Retroflexe, Indoarisch von Mitanni. Heidelberg: Winter.

LIV — Rix, H. et al. (2001). Lexicon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.

LRP — Prósper, B. M. (2002). Lenguas y religiones prerromanas del Occidente de la Península Ibérica. Salamanca: EUSAL.

Malzahn, M. (2011). Back to the Fields and to the Woods: Old Irish íath ʻLand, Field’ and fíad ʻWild; Deer; Uncultivated Land’ Revisited. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 39, 116–128.

McCone, K. (1991). The Indo-European Origins of the Old Irish nasal Presents, Subjunctives and Futures. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

McCone, K. (1996). Towards a Relative Chronology of Ancient and Medieval Celtic Sound Change. Maynooth: National University of Ireland.

Mees, B. (2008). Case and Genre in Gaulish: from Mont Auxois to the Pont dʼAncy. Journal of Celtic Linguistics, 12, 121–138.

Meiser, G. (2003). Veni, vidi, vici. Die Vorgeschichte des Lateinischen Perfektsystems. Munich: C. H. Beck.

Meißner, T. (2010). Bratonio gratias: Bemerkungen zur festlandkeltischen Onomastik und Phraseologie. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 57, 97–106.

Melchert, H. C. (1997). Traces of a PIE Aspectual Contrast in Anatolian? Incontri Linguistici, 20, 83–92.

MLH-1 — Untermann, J. (1975). Monumenta Linguarum Hispanicarum. Vol. 1: Die Münzlegenden. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.

MLH-4 — Untermann, J. (1997). Monumenta Linguarum Hispanicarum. Vol. 4: Die tartessischen, keltiberischen und lusitanischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.

MLH-5 — Wodtko, D. S. (1999). Monumenta Linguarum Hispanicarum. Vol. 5: Wörterbuch der keltiberischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.

Neu, E. (1995). Zur Herkunft des Inselnamens Kypros. Glotta, 73, 1–7.

Nussbaum, A. J. (1999). *Jocidus: An Account of the Latin Adjectives in -idus. In H. Eichner, & H.-Ch. Luschützky (Eds.), Compositiones Indogermanicae. In memoriam Jochem Schindler (pp. 377–419). Prague: Enigma Corporation.

Nussbaum, A. J. (2004a). A -t- Party: Various IE Nominal Stems in *-(o/e)t-. Talk held at the 16th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, November 2004 (unpublished manuscript).

Nussbaum, A. J. (2004b). Cool *-ēd-: The Latin frīgēdō and Greek ἀλγηδών, τηκεδών, and ῥῑγεδανός Types. Talk held at the 23rd East Coast Indo-European Conference, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, 24–27 May 2004 (unpublished manuscript).

Olcoz Yanguas, S., & Medrano Marqués, M. M. (2008). Revisión paleográfica de las inscripciones celtibéricas en signario paleohispánico alfabetizado. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie 2, 105–122.

Pinault, G.-J. (1980). Instrumental et adverbe prédicatif (en marge de «Genetiv und Adjektiv»). LALIES, 1, 31–33.

Pinault, G.-J. (1996). [Review of The Gaulish Calendar by G. Olmsted]. Gnomon, 68, 706–710.

Prósper, B. M. (2012). The Hispano-Celtic Divinity Ilurbeda, Gold Mining in Western Hispania and the Syntactic Context of Celtiberian arkatobezom “Silver Mine”. Die Sprache, 49, 53–83.

Prósper, B. M. (2014a). Some Notes on the Structure and Meaning of the Bronze ʻResʼ. Keltische Forschungen, 6, 157–164.

Prósper, B. M. (2014b). Time for Celtiberian Dialectology: Celtiberian Syllabic Structure and the Bronze Tablet from Torrijo del Campo (Teruel). Keltische Forschungen, 6, 115–155.

Prósper, B. M. (2015). Celtic and non-Celtic Divinities from Ancient Hispania: Power, Daylight, Fertility, Water Spirits and What they Can Tell us about Indo-European Morphology. The Journal of Indo-European Studies, 43, 1–56.

Prósper, B. M. (2016). The Indo-European Names of Central Hispania. A Study in Continental Celtic and Latin Word Formation. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Prósper, B. M. (2017). Linguistic Observations on Two Divinities of the Celtic Cantabri: ervdino, Divinity of the Yearly Cycle. cabvniaegino, the Celtic Fate of IE *kHp- and the Gaulish Spindle Whorl from Saint Réverien. In R. Häussler, & A. King (Eds.), Celtic Religions in the Roman Period. Personal, Local and Global (pp. 207–228). Aberystwyth: Celtic Studies Publications.

Prósper, B. M. (2019a). Celtic and Venetic in Contact: The Dialectal Attribution of the Personal Names in the Venetic Record. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 66, 131–176.

Prósper, B. M. (2019b). Language Change at the Crossroads: what Celtic, what Venetic, and what Else in the Personal Names of Emona? Voprosy Onomastiki, 16(4), 33–73. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.4.044

Prósper, B. M. (forthc.). Mars Veneticus and the ʻpalma-Ruleʼ. In F. Chiusaroli (Ed.), Miscellanea di studi in onore di Diego Poli. Rome: Il Calamo.

Recasens, D. (2014). Coarticulation and Sound Change in Romance. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Renou, L. (1997). Les éléments védiques dans le vocabulaire du sanskrit classique. In N. Balbir, & G.- J. Pinault (Eds.), Choix dʼétudes indiennes (pp. 157–240). Paris: École Française dʼExtrême Orient.

RIB-1 — Collingwood, R. G., & Wright, R. P. (1965). The Roman Inscriptions of Britain, I, Inscriptions on Stone. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

RIB-3 —Tomlin, R. S. O., Wright, R. P., & Hassall, M. W. C. (2009). The Roman Inscriptions of Britain, III, Inscriptions on Stone. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

RIG-2/1 — Lejeune, M. (1988). Textes gallo-étrusques. Textes gallo-latins sur pierre. Paris: C.N.R.S.

RIG-3 — Duval, P. M., & Pinault, G. J. (1986). Recueil des inscriptions gauloises. Tome 3: Les Calendriers (Coligny, Villards dʼHeria). Paris: C.N.R.S.

Rix, H. (2000). Oskisch brateis bratom, Lateinisch grates. In A. Hintze, & E. Tichy (Eds.), Anusantatyai. Festschrift für Johanna Narten zum 70. Geburtstag (pp. 207–229). Dettelbach: Röll.

Rocca, G. (1996). Iscrizioni umbre minori. Florence: Olschki.

Rubat Borel, F. (2005). Lingue e scritture delle alpi occidentali prima della romanizzazione. Stato della questione e nuove ricerche. Bulletin dʼÉtudes Préhistoriques et Archéologiques Alpines, 16, 9–50.

Sasseville, D. (2020). Anatolian Verbal Stem Formation. Leiden: Brill.

Scarlata, S. (1999). Die Wurzelkomposita im R̥gVeda. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag.

Schmidt, K. H. (1986). Keltiberisch Tocoitos/Tocoitei und gallisch Ucuete/Ucuetin. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 41, 1–4.

Schmidt, K. H. (1991). [Review of Textes gallo-étrusques. Textes gallo-latins sur pierre, Recueil des inscriptions gauloises by P.-M. Duval]. Indogermanische Forschungen, 96, 362–365.

Schrijver, P. (1995). Studies in British Celtic Historical Phonology. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Schrijver, P. (1998). The British word for ‘fox’ and its Indo-European origin. Journal of Indo-European Studies, 26(3-4), 421–434.

Schumacher, S. (2004). Die keltischen Primärverben. Ein vergleichendes, etymologisches und morphologisches Lexikon. Innsbruck: Innsbrücker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Seebold, E. (1970). Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton.

ST — Rix, H. (2002). Sabellische Texte. Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen und Südpikenischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag.

Stifter, D. (2003). [Review of Kelten. Celts. Bilder ihrer Kultur. Images of their Culture by H. Birkhan]. Die Sprache, 43, 237–243.

Szemerényi, O. (1974). A Gaulish Dedicatory Formula. Kuhnʼs Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft, 88, 246–286.

Takayama, T. (2015). Historical Phonology. In H. Kubozono (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology (pp. 621–650). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511984.621

Thurneysen, R. (1923). Irisches und Gallisches. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 14, 1–12.

Uhlich, J. (1989). DOV(A)- and Lenited -B- in Ogam. Ériu, 40, 129–133.

Uhlich, J. (1995). On the Fate of Intervocalic *-ṷ - in Old Irish, Especially between Neutral Vowels. Ériu, 46, 11–48.

Untermann, J. (1961). Die venetischen Personennamen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Untermann, J. (1995). Die vorrömischen Personennamen der Randzonen des alten Italien. Namenforschung / Name Studies / Les noms propres, 1, 732–738. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110114263.1.8.732

Velaza, J. (2008). La onomástica personal en la epigrafía romana de la Meseta Meridional: una aproximación. In G. Carrasco Serrano (Ed.), La romanización en el territorio de Castilla-La Mancha (pp. 367–383). Ciudad Real: Ediciones Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.

Vendryes, J. (1922). Sur quelques formations de mots latins. I. Les substantifs masculins en -a. II. Quelques dérivés de thème en -u- (-tu-). Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique, 22, 97–106.

Vijūnas, A. (2009). The Indo-European Primary T-Stems. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Vind. Tab. — Bowman, A. K., & Thomas, J. D. (1994–). The Vindolanda Writing-tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses). London: British Museum Press.

Vine, B. (2006). On Thurneysen-Havet’s Law in Latin and Italic. Historische Sprachforschung, 119, 211–249.

Vitali, D., & Kaenel, G. (2000). Un Helvète chez les Étrusques vers 300 av. J.-C. Archäologie der Schweiz, 23, 115–122.

Watkins, C. (1994). Varia II. 1. Irish milchobur. 2. Old Irish antar. In L. Oliver (Ed.), Calvert Watkins. Selected Studies (Vol. 1, pp. 92–96). Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.

Weiss, M. (2020). An Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor; New York: Beech Stave Press.

Widmer, P. (2005). Der altindische vrkī́-Typus und hethitisch nakki-: Der indogermanische Instrumental zwischen Syntax und Morphologie. Die Sprache, 45, 190–208.

WOU — Untermann, J. (2000). Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag.

Zair, N. (2012). The Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals in Celtic. Leiden: Brill.