Pavel A. Gusenkov
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
(National Research University)
Dolgoprudny, Russia
Revisiting the “West-Baltic” Type Hydronymy in Central Russia
Voprosy onomastiki, 2021, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp. 67–87 (in Russian)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2021.18.2.019
Received on 6 October 2020
Abstract: The article examines the substrate hydronymy of the middle Oka and the Dnieper regions (ending in -va, -da, etc.) that is typically attributed to the West-Baltic toponymic stratum and associated with the language of the Moschinskaya archaeological culture and the related archaeological sites. The author analyzed its spatial distribution in the East European Plain. The study has found that: 1) the spread of names of waterbodies ending in -va correlates with the distribution scheme of substrate Baltic hydronymy in general and the monuments of the Dnieper-Dvina, Yukhnovskaya, and Late Dyakovo cultures of the Early Iron Age; 2) the spread of hydronyms with zh/z sound variation (including as a distinctive feature) correlates with the Krivich and Radimich culture areas, and the range of Russian dialects with lisping pronunciation which makes no difference between sibilants and hushing sounds; 3) Baltic hydronymy ending in -da is not attested in the area of the Moschinskaya culture and related archaeological sites; 4) among the names with the root ape-/upe- found in the same cultural milieu, only those containing Eastern Baltic variant are verifiable; 5) the hypothesis for East Baltic origination of the names with the root stab- is not inferior to the West Baltic; 6) there are no sufficient grounds for tracing some river names to the Prussian words pannean and sug since most of these hydronyms refer to a later period while the others have more plausible explanations; 7) for some hydronyms (Zerna, Opochinka, Ponya, Sezhikovka, etc.) the substrate origin is not confirmed. Based on the above observations, the hypothesis for the presence of a West-Baltic layer of hydronymy in the middle Oka region and the consequent assumption of the West-Baltic origin of the Moshinskaya culture were disputed.
Keywords: substrate hydronymy, Balts, Slavs, the Oka river basin, Moschinskaya archaeological culture, toponymic area, toponymic stratigraphy.
References
Ageeva, R. A. (2004). Toponimiia russkogo Severo-Zapada kak istochnik kul’turno-istoricheskoi informatsii [Toponymy of the Russian North-West as a Source of Cultural and Historical Information]. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
Filin, F. P. (2006). Proiskhozhdenie russkogo, ukrainskogo i belorusskogo iazykov [The Origin of the Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian Languages]. Moscow: KomKniga.
Gordova, Yu. Yu. (2014). Toponimicheskaia stratigrafiia Srednego Pooch’ia: rezul’taty sovmeshcheniia arealov substratnoi toponimii s arealami arkheologicheskikh kul’tur [Toponymic Stratigraphy of The Middle Oka Region: The Results of a Comparison of Substrate Toponymy Areas and Archaeological Culture Areas]. Voprosy onomastiki, 2(17), 35–53.
Gordova, Yu. Yu. (2018). Lingvisticheskie problemy regional’noi onomastiki v istoricheskoi perspektive (na materiale riazanskoi toponimii i antroponimii) [Linguistic Problems of Regional Onomastics in a Historical Perspective (Based on the Ryazan Toponymy and Anthroponymy)] (Habilitation dissertation, Vol. 1). Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, Moscow.
Krenke, N. A. (2011). D’iakovo gorodishche: kul’tura naseleniia basseina Moskvy-reki v I tys. do n. e. — I tys. n. e. [Dyakovo Settlement: The Culture of the Population of the Moskva River Basin in the 1st Millennium BC — 1st Millennium AD]. Moscow: IA RAN.
Lekomtseva, M. I. (1982). K rekonstruktsii fonologicheskikh sistem iazykov goliadi i dnepro-dvinskikh baltov — 2 [To the Reconstruction of the Phonological Systems of the Golyad and the Dnieper-Dvina Balts Languages — 2]. In V. V. Ivanov (Ed.), Balto-slavianskie issledovaniia. 1981 [Balto-Slavic Studies. 1981] (pp. 88–96). Moscow: Nauka.
Matveyev, A. K. (2001–2015). Substratnaia toponimiia Russkogo Severa [Substrate Toponymy of the Russian North] (Vols. 1–4). Ekaterinburg: Ural University Press.
Napolskikh, V. V. (2018). Ocherki po etnicheskoi istorii [Essays on Ethnic History]. Kazan: Kazanskaia nedvizhimost’.
Schmidt, E. A. (2003). Verkhnee Podneprov’e i Podvin’e v III–VII vv. n. e. Tushemlinskaia kul’tura [The Upper Dnieper and Dvina in the 3rd–7th Centuries AD: Tushemlinskaya Culture]. Smolensk: [s. n.].
Sedov, V. V. (1970). Slaviane Verkhnego Podneprov’ia i Podvin’ia [Slavs of the Upper Dnieper and Dvina Regions]. Moscow: Nauka.
Sedov, V. V. (2004). Golteskify. In V. M. Goryunova, & O. A. Shcheglova (Eds.), Kul’turnye transformatsii i vzaimovliianiia v Dneprovskom regione na iskhode rimskogo vremeni i v rannem Srednevekov’e [Cultural Transformations and Mutual Influences in the Dnieper Region at the End of the Roman Period and in the Early Middle Ages] (pp. 88–95). St Petersburg: Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie.
Stavitsky, V. V. (2016). O granitsakh rasprostraneniia i lokal’nykh variantakh gorodetskoi kul’tury [On the Distribution Range and Local Variants of Gorodets Culture]. NovaInfo.Ru, 4(56), 121–128.
Toporov, V. N., & Trubachov, O. N. (1993). Lіngvіstychny analіz gіdronіmau verkhniaga Padniaprouia [Linguistic Analysis of Hydronyms of the Upper Dnieper Basin]. Spadchyna, 4, 53–62.
Toporov, V. N. (1989). Baltiiskii element v gidronimii Pooch’ia — 2 [Baltic Elements in the Hydronymy of the Oka River Basin. 2]. In V. V. Ivanov (Ed.), Balto-slavianskie issledovaniia. 1987 [Balto-Slavic Studies. 1987] (pp. 47–69). Moscow: Nauka.
Toporov, V. N. (1997). Baltiiskii element v gidronimii Pooch’ia — 3 [Baltic Elements in the Hydronymy of the Oka River Basin. 3]. In T. M. Sudnik, & E. A. Helimski (Eds.), Balto-slavianskie issledovaniia. 1988–1996 [Balto-Slavic Studies. 1988–1996] (pp. 276–310). Moscow: Indrik.
Toporov, V. N. (2010). Issledovaniia po etimologii i semantike [Studies in Etymology and Semantics] (Vol. 4, Iss. 2). Moscow: Rukopisnye pamiatniki Drevnei Rusi.
Toporov, V. N., & Trubachev, O. N. (2009). Lingvisticheskii analiz gidronimov Verkhnego Podneprov’ia [Linguistic Analysis of Hydronyms of the Upper Dnieper Basin]. In O. N. Trubachev (Ed.), Trudy po etimologii: Slovo. Istoriia. Kul’tura [Works in Etymology: Word. History. Culture] (Vol. 4, pp. 7–380). Moscow: Rukopisnye pamiatniki Drevnei Rusi.
Trubachev, O. N. (Ed.). (2009). Trudy po etimologii: Slovo. Istoriia. Kul’tura (Vol. 4) [Works in Etymology: Word. History. Culture]. Moscow: Rukopisnye pamiatniki Drevnei Rusi.
Trubachev, O. N., Zhuravlev, A. F., & Varbot, Zh. Zh. (Eds.). (1974–). Etimologicheskii slovar’ slavianskikh iazykov [Etymological Dictionary of Slavic Languages] (Vols. 1–). Moscow: Nauka.
Vasilyev, V. L. (2012). Slavianskie toponimicheskie drevnosti Novgorodskoi zemli [Slavic Toponymic Antiquities of the Novgorod Land]. Moscow: Rukopisnye pamiatniki Drevnei Rusi.
Vorontsov, A. M. (2013). Kul’turno-khronologicheskie gorizonty pamiatnikov II‒V vekov na territorii Oksko-Donskogo vodorazdela [Cultural and Chronological Range of Monuments of the 1st–2nd Centuries AD on the Territory of the Oka–Don Watershed]. Tula: Kulikovo pole.
Yanin, V. L. (1998). Novgorod i Litva. Pogranichnye situatsii XIII–XV vekov [Novgorod and Lithuania. Border Situations of the 13th–15th Centuries]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU.
Yashchenko, A. I. (1974). Yazykovaia prinadlezhnost’ toponimii i mikrotoponimii Kurskoi oblasti [Linguistic Affiliation of Toponymy and Microtoponymy of the Kursk Region]. In E. M. Pospelov (Ed.), Voprosy geografii. Vyp. 94: Toponimiia Tsentral’noi Rossii [Problems of Geography. Issue 94: Toponymy of Central Russia] (pp. 95–103). Moscow: Mysl’.
|