ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Maria V. Akhmetova
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Moscow, Russia

“A Town with Two Names”: A Historical Oikonym in Modern Context (The Case of the Town of Pokrovsk/Engels)

Voprosy onomastiki, 2021, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp. 159–176 (in Russian)
DOI: 10.15826/vopr_onom.2021.18.1.007

Received on 14 April 2020

Abstract: The article uses the example of the town of Engels (Saratov Region) to explore the case of duplicate naming in the local usage, i.e. the use of the historical oikonym Pokrovsk (until 1931) and its derivatives along with the official name of the town or instead of it. The author showcases that in the local speech, the historical name of the town has become a living alternative used in almost every sphere except business and documentation. At the same time, there are some testimonies to the gradual demarcation of the language contexts associated with the old town name and its derivatives. Until the mid-1990s, the name Pokrovsk and the adjective pokrovskii were regarded nearly as equivalents to the corresponding official names. Currently, their use is confined to Russian Orthodox circles (due to the religious origins of the name Pokrovsk derived from Pokrov ‘the Intercession of the Theotokos’ — an Orthodox holiday). Apart from that, the derivatives with pokrovsk- component can occur in proper names, mainly of commercial (names of business entities and products) and cultural (names of holidays) types. Other usage cases refer to mass media or urban naming. Meanwhile, the demonym pokrovchane, which in the Soviet period was only limited to historical contexts, reclaimed its positions in the 1990s. Currently, it is widely used in the local press and everyday speech, being more popular than the formal variant engelsity (and even less frequent engelsites, engelstsy, engel(s)chane). The reason why pokrovchane proved more usable lies in both the inconsistency and variability of the Engels-based demonyms in the mid-20th and early 21st centuries. The author also addresses the case of “hybrid” naming with both old and new oikonyms combined: Pokrovsk-Engels (Engels-Pokrovsk) and their derivatives. The mentioned onyms are mainly used in local contexts (city’s holiday celebrations, cultural events, local history, etc.).

The article was prepared under the RANEPA state assignment research program.

Keywords: Engels, Pokrovsk, oikonym, renaming, names of cities and towns, oikonymic derivatives, return of historical oikonyms.

References

Abramov, R., & Terentyev, E. (2014). Simvolicheskoe prostranstvo kul’tury pamiati: dva toponimicheskikh keisa [Symbolic Space of Cultural Memory: Two Toponymic Cases]. Interaktsiia. Interv’iu. Interpretatsiia, 1(8), 73–86.

Akhmetova, M. V. (2015). Ot A-Aty do Yarska: slovar’ neofitsial’nykh nazvanii naselennykh punktov [From A-Ata to Yarsk: A Dictionary of Unofficial Settlement Names]. Moscow: FORUM.

Bochkarev, A. (2018, November 04). Pereimenovaniia gorodov na postsovetskom prostranstve [Renaming Cities in the Post-Soviet Space]. Polit.ru. Retrieved from https://polit.ru/article/2018/11/04/ps_renaming

Bursa, G. R. F. (1985). Political changes of names of Soviet towns. The Slavonic and East European Review, 63(2), 161–193.

David, J. (2011). Commemorative place names — Their specificity and problems. Names, 59(3), 199–213.

Erofeev, A. D. (2005). Istoki massovykh pereimenovanii i opyt vozvrashcheniia istoricheskikh nazvanii v Peterburge [The Tradition of Large-scale Renaming and the Practice of Restoring Historical Names in St Petersburg]. Novyi toponimicheskii zhurnal, 2, 39–42.

Golomidova, M. V. (2018). Toponimicheskaia politika v sfere nominatsii vnutrigorodskikh ob”ektov: teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy [Toponymic Policy in Naming City Facilities: Theoretical and Applied Issues]. Voprosy onomastiki, 15(3), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2018.15.3.028

Gorodetskaya, I. L., & Levashov, E. A. (2003). Russkie nazvaniia zhitelei: slovar’-spravochnik [Russian Demonyms: Reference Book] Moscow: Russkie slovari; Astrel’; AST.

Ilyin, D. Yu. (2012). Toponimicheskaia leksika v tekstakh regional’nykh gazet kontsa XIX — nachala XX veka: dinamicheskie protsessy. [Toponymic Vocabulary in Regional Newspapers of the Late 19th — early 20th Century: Dynamic Processes] Volgograd: Izd-vo VolGU.

Ilyin, D. Yu. (2019). Pereimenovaniia naselennykh punktov kak rezul’tat protestnoi kommunikatsii [Settlement Renaming as Result of Protest Communication]. In N. L. Shamne, & L. N. Rebrina (Eds.), Sovremennyi protest kak novaia kommunikativnaia sistema: materialy kruglogo stola s mezhdunar. uchastiem [Modern Protest as a New Communication System: Proceedings of the International Conference] (pp. 46–49). Volgograd: Volgograd. gos. un-t.

Ilyin, P. (1993). Renaming of Soviet cities after exceptional people: A historical perspective on toponymy. Post-Soviet Geography, 34(10), 612–660.

Kachalkova, Yu. A., & Rut, M. E. (2019). “Ideologicheskie” urbanonimy i pereimenovanie gorodskikh ob”ektov [“Ideological” Urban Place Names and the Renaming of City Streets]. Voprosy onomastiki, 16(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.3.038

Kolba, A. I. (2012). Upravlenie konfliktami v sisteme otnoshenii organov vlasti i grazhdanskogo obshchestva na regional’nom urovne [Conflict Management in the System of Relations between Authorities and Civil Society at the Regional Level]. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. “Sotsiologiia. Politologiia”, 12(1), 75–81.

Levashov, E. A. (2000). Geograficheskie nazvaniia. Prilagatel’nye, obrazovannye ot nikh. Nazvaniia zhitelei: slovar’-spravochnik [Geographic Names. Adjectives Derived from them. Names of Residents: a Reference Book]. St Petersburg: Dmitrii Bulanin.

Lopatin, V. V. (Ed.). (2007). Pravila russkoi orfografii i punktuatsii: polnyi akademicheskii spravochnik [Russian Spelling and Punctuation Rules: A Complete Academic Handbook]. Moscow: Eksmo.

Maiorov, M. V. (2004). Levtolstovtsy iz Astapova (vzgliad na toponimicheskuiu adaptatsiiu naseleniia) [Levtolstovtsy from Astapov (a Look at Toponymic Adaptation of the Population)]. In R. Sh. Dzharylgasinova, & V. I. Suprun (Eds.), Onomastika Povolzh’ia: materialy IX Mezhdunar. konf. [Onomastics of the Volga Region: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference] (pp. 158–162). Moscow: IEA RAN.

Mezenko, A. M. (2018). Problemy pereimenovaniia lineinykh vnutrigorodskikh ob”ektov segodnia [Problems of Present-day Renaming of Linear Urban Sites]. Onomastika v Smolenske i Vitebske: problemy i perspektivy issledovaniia, 6, 131–135

Neroznak, V. P., & Gorbanevsky, M. V. (1991). Sovetskii “novoiaz” na geograficheskoi karte [The Soviet “Novoyaz” on a Geographical Map]. Moscow: Znanie.

Plekhanov, A. A. (2018). Razrushenie prostranstva sovetskogo simvolicheskogo gospodstva v postsovetskoi Ukraine [Collapse of Soviet Symbolic Domination Space in Post-Soviet Ukraine]. Politicheskaia nauka, 3, 231–263. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2018.03.10

Pospelov, E. M. (1990). Pereimenovaniia gorodov i sel v SSSR [Renaming of Cities and Villages in the USSR]. In E. M. Pospelov (Ed.), Toponimika SSSR [Toponymy of the USSR] (pp. 54–73). Moscow: MFGO.

Pospelov, E. M. (2008). Geograficheskie nazvaniia Rossii: toponimicheskii slovar’ [Geographical Names of Russia: A Toponymic Dictionary]. Moscow: AST; Astrel’.

Razumov, R. V. (2018). Onimicheskie konflikty v rossiiskom urbanonimicheskom prostranstve [Onymic Conflicts in the Russian Urbanonymic Space]. Verkhnevolzhskii filologicheskii vestnik, 4, 112–119.

Reut, G. A. (2014). Ispol’zovanie dvoinogo naimenovaniia v zakrytykh gorodakh Sibiri v 1950 — nachale 1990-kh gg [The Use of a Double Name in the Closed Cities of Siberia in the 1950s — early 1990s]. Vestnik Krasnoiarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 5, 242–246.

Savoskul, M. S. (2016). Staroe novoe nazvanie goroda: Romanov-Borisoglebsk ili Tutaev? [Old New City Name: Romanov-Borisoglebsk or Tutaev?]. In M. V. Akhmetova, M. I. Baiduzh, & N. V. Petrov (Eds.), Brendirovanie territorii: mezhdu marketingom i fol’klorom: materialy Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. [Territory Branding: between Marketing and Folklore: Proceedings of the International Conference] (pp. 71–74). Moscow: Delo.

Terentyev, E. A. (2015). Pereimenovanie sovetskikh toponimov v Sankt-Peterburge: analiz publichnykh diskussii [Renaming Soviet Place Names in St Petersburg: Analysis of Public Discussions]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii, 18(2), 72–86.

Vrublevskaya, O. V. (2017). Iazykovaia moda v russkoi onomastike [Linguistic Trends in Russian Onomastics]. Volgograd: Peremena.