ВОПРОСЫ ОНОМАСТИКИ | PROBLEMS OF ONOMASTICS

Yuri Sergeevich Kostylev
Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Alexandra Vasilievna Tikhomirova
Ekaterinburg Ecclesiastical Seminary, Ekaterinburg, Russia

DETOPONYMIC NAMES OF URAL MINERALS: WORD-FORMATION PATTERNS

For citation
Kostylev, Yu. S., & Tikhomirova, A. V. (2025). Detoponymic Names of Ural Minerals: Word-Formation Patterns. Voprosy onomastiki, 22(1), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2025.22.1.008

Received on 15 October 2024
Accepted on 20 December 2024

Abstract: The article examines the names of minerals derived from toponyms found in the Urals. The material for the study was sourced from specialized works on the mineralogy of the region, Russia, and the world. The aim of the research is to analyze the word-formation patterns characteristic of detoponymic mineral names, both in motivational and formal terms. The detoponymic pattern ranks as the second most frequent for mineral names, accounting for 21% of the total number of Ural mineral names (with the most frequent pattern being the deanthroponymic one). Given the diversity of the mineral nomenclature in the Urals, it can be inferred that this ratio is applicable to official scientific mineralogy in general. The most common way of forming a detoponymic mineral name involves using the name of a place directly associated with mining as the base lexeme, typically in its full initial form, followed by the addition of the typical mineral name suffix -it. The name of a man-made object (such as a mining site) is most frequently used as the donor token. In the motivational aspect, deviations from this pattern are rare, occurring when the mineral is named not after the place of discovery, but a neighboring object. Additionally, several minerals are named after celestial bodies. In the formal aspect, deviations manifest as various modifications of the base lexeme (often through truncation), which results in the formation of a compact and user-friendly term. These deviations, both motivational and formal, are linked to the desire to create a euphonic term that fits into the scientific terminological system and avoids ambiguity. The mineral names examined reveal a tendency to associate the resulting term with a significant place for the name-giver and the professional community. Moreover, naming based on mining enables specialists to draw conclusions about the mineral’s characteristics from its name.

Keywords: names of minerals (mineralonymy); naming; naming patterns; toponymy; word formation; historical lexicology; terminological system; mining; Urals

Acknowledgements
The research is part of the project Interaction of Cultural and Linguistic Traditions: the Urals in the Context of the Dynamics of Historical Processes, funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia (project number FEUZ-2023-0018).

References

Berezovich, E. L., & Kabakova, G. I. (2022). “Nevinnyi kamen’”: motiv vina v kul’turno-iazykovom obraze ametista [“Innocent Stone”: The Motif of Guilt in the Cultural-Linguistic Image of Amethyst]. In E. A. Belousova (Ed.), Prekrasneishei: sbornik pamiati Eleny Dushechkinoi [A Collection of Articles in Memory of Elena Dusheckina] (pp. 545–554). St Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.

Berezovich, E. L., & Kabakova, G. I. (2023). “Kamen’ sviashchennika” / “tserkovnyi kamen’” v zapadnoevropeiskoi i russkoi kul’turno-iazykovykh traditsiiakh [“Priest’s Stone” / “Church Stone” in Western European and Russian Cultural-Linguistic Traditions]. In S. M. Tolstaya (Ed.), Slovo i chelovek: k 100-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia akademika Nikity Il’icha Tolstogo [Word and Man: On the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of Nikita I. Tolstoy] (pp. 361–385). Moscow: Indrik.

Berezovich, E. L., & Surikova, O. D. (2022). Zmeinyi kamen’ zmeevik: etnolingvisticheskii kommentarii [The Snake Stone Zmeevik: Ethnolinguistic Commentary]. Traditsionnaia kul’tura, 23(4), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.26158/TK.2022.23.4.005

Feoktistova, A. V. (2022). Rol’ perevoda v formirovanii mineralogicheskoi terminologii v russkom iazyke v XVIII veke [The Role of Translation in the Formation of Mineralogical Terminology in the 18th Century Russian Language]. In Ch. B. Daletsky, & A. Yu. Platko (Eds.), Dialog kul’tur i tsivilizatsij: sbornik trudov III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Moskva, 14–16 aprelia 2022 g.) [Dialogue of Cultures and Civilizations: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference (Moscow, April 14–16, 2022)] (pp. 496–504). Moscow: MGLU.

Kostylev, Yu. S., & Tikhomirova, A. V. (2024). Otantroponimicheskie naimenovaniia mineralov Urala: modeli obrazovaniia [Deanthroponymic Names of Ural Minerals: Word-Formation Patterns]. Voprosy onomastiki, 21(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2024.21.1.005

Kuchko, V. S. (2022). Kak imia kamnia preduprezhdaet ob obmane: ob odnom motive nominatsii v mineralogicheskoi leksike [How the Name of a Stone Warns about Deception: On One Motif in Mineralogical Vocabulary]. Antropologicheskii forum, 53, 154–174. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-53-154-174

Kuchko, V. S. (2023). Mnogolikii serdolik: istoriia nazvanii kamnia v russkoi iazykovoi traditsii [The Many Faces of Carnelian: The History of the Stone’s Name in Russian Linguistic Tradition]. Izvestiya Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Gumanitarnye nauki, 25(4), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.15826/izv2.2023.25.4.072

Shaikhinurova, D. R. (2024). Nazvaniia mineralov v “Mineralogicheskom slovare Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva” 1790 g.: istoriko-leksikologicheskii aspekt [The Naming of Minerals in the “Mineralogical Dictionary of the Free Economic Society” of 1790: A Historical-Lexicological Aspect] (Master’s thesis). Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg.