2026, Volume 23, Issue 2
|
Blanca María Prósper FURTHER LINGUISTIC CONSIDERATIONS ON A NEW CELTIBERIAN BRONZE
For citation Received on 12 January 2026 Abstract: A new Celtiberian bronze in the Latin alphabet, probably dating back to the mid 1st c. BC, has been made public and partially studied in 2025. Recently, a welcome work has seen the light that includes a reliable photograph. It contains a number of minor text corrections of this Celtiberian bronze. Therefore, an adjustment of the author’s previous views, as put forward in her preliminary work, published in Voprosy onomastiki, is in order. This article is complementary of the former one and shall address the problems inherent in the editor’s personal interpretation of the bronze, as well as some issues regarding Celtic inflectional endings. Specifically, the paper focuses on the form of the non-neuter dual nom.-acc. ending, which continues *-ŏ in Irish and Gaulish and therefore significantly differs from the mark *-ō (< *-oh1) inherited by most Indo-European languages. In all likelihood, the dual owes this innovative ending to the numeral *duu̯ŏ ‘two’. The author contend that Celtiberian took part in this important inflectional innovation, and that this text contains institutional terms suggestive of Celtiberian towns having had two co-rulers or military leaders. A number of new onomastic and lexical items are identified and when possible translated, the paper also aims to clarify some aspects of the syntax of the whole document. On the phonetic side, the author maintains her views on the disappearance of IE *-d in auslaut in the dialect of the Arevaci and the presence of ablative forms in this text, however, the idea that final nasals had been weakened is to be revised: in the author’s present view, they had possibly been neutralised as -m and reflected as -<m> at least in the dialect of the Arevaci. Keywords: Celtic languages; Celtiberian language; Indo-European language reconstruction; Celtic anthroponymy; Celtic toponymy; Celtic morphology; Celtiberian dialectology References CIL — Mommsen, Th. et al. (1862–). Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Cowgill, W. (1970). Italic and Celtic Superlatives and the Dialects of Indo-European. In G. Cardona et al. (Eds.), Indo-European and Indo-Europeans (pp. 113–153). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Cowgill, W. (1985). PIE *duo ‘2’in Germanic and Celtic, and the Nom.-Acc. Dual of Non-neuter o-Stems. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, 46, 13–28. EDPC — Matasović, R. (2009). Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Celtic. Leiden: Brill. Gorrochategui, J. (1990). Consideraciones sobre la fórmula onomástica y la expresión del origen en algunos textos celtibéricos menores. In F. Villar (Ed.), Studia Indogermanica et Palaeohispanicain Honorem A. Tovar et L. Michelena (pp.291–312). Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. Gorrochategui, J. (2026). Bronce celtibérico en alfabeto latino de Igedankom, Complutum, Alcalá de Henares (Madrid). Un avance. Veleia, 43, 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1387/veleia.28075 Lambert, P.-Y. (1994). La langue gauloise. Description linguistique. Commentaire d’inscriptions choisies. Paris: Errance Éditions. Lewis, H., & Pedersen, H. (1989). A Concise Comparative Celtic Grammar (3rd ed.). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. Malzahn, M. (2000). Die nominalen Flexionsendungen desidg. Duals. Historische Sprachforschung, 112, 204–226. Martínez Chico, D., & Prósper, B. M. (2021). A New Celtiberian Tessera in the Latin Alphabet from Virovesca (Briviesca, Burgos) and the Typology of Tesserae Hospitales. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 68, 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/zcph-2021-0008 Méndez Dosuna, J. V. (2007). Ex praesente lux. In I. Hajnal (Ed.), Die altgriechischen Dialekte, Wesen und Werden (pp. 355–384). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck. MLH-1 — Untermann, J. (1975). Monumenta Linguarum Hispanicarum I. Die Münzlegenden. Wiesbaden: Reichert. MLH-4 — Untermann, J. (1997), Monumenta Linguarum Hispanicarum IV. Die tartessischen, keltiberischen und lusitanischen Inschriften. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag. Neri, S. (2017). Wetter. Etymologie und Lautgesetz. Perugia: Università degli Studi di Perugia. Prósper, B. M. (2016), The Indo-European Names of Central Hispania. A Study in Continental Celtic and Latin Word Formation. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft. Prósper, B. M. (2025). Some Linguistic Considerations on a New Celtiberian Bronze. Voprosy onomastiki, 22(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2025.22.1.004 Prósper, B. M., & Medrano Duque, M. (2022). Ancient Gaulish and British Divinities: Notes on the Reconstruction of Celtic Phonology and Morphology. Voprosy onomastiki, 19(2), 9–47. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.2.015 RIG–2/1 — Lejeune, M. (1988). Textes gallo-étrusques. Textes gallo-latins sur pierre. Paris: CNRS. RIG-4 — Colbert de Beaulieu, J.-B., & Fischer, B. (Eds.). (1998). Recueil des inscriptions gauloises (Vol. 4: Les légendes monétaires). Paris: CNRS. Schrijver, P. (1995). Studies in British Celtic Historical Phonology. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Stifter, D. (2006). Zwei Geisterwagen. Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, 11, 141–156. Thurneysen, R. (1927). Zu den Grafiti von La Graufesenque. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie, 16, 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/zcph.1927.16.1.285 Thurneysen, R. et al. (1946). A Grammar of Old Irish (Rev. and enl. ed.). Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.
|
 |
