2025, Volume 22, Issue 1
|
Jan Holeš PEOPLE LOVE TO NAME THINGS: CURRENT TRENDS IN NAMING MINOR PLANETS
For citation Received on 16 December 2023 Abstract: After several introductory remarks regarding the onomastic terminology used for names of celestial objects, the article proposes a semantic and a limited formal analysis of the minor planet names officially published in 2022 by the International Astronomical Union in its sixteen Working Group Small Bodies Nomenclature Bulletins. Besides the technical data on the newly discovered minor planets, these bulletins contain short motivations of minor planet names. The paper further describes the minor planet nomenclature and the rules governing their naming. This nomenclature has a clearly defined set of rules, and besides the names, there exist two other parallel ways to designate minor planets: provisional designation and number. Out of the total 648 minor planet names, an overwhelming majority (585 names, 90%) are based on anthroponyms, with three roughly identifiable subgroups of names commemorating (a) scientists, (b) “celebrities”, mostly artists and athletes, and (c) the discoverers’ relatives and friends. Within the first subgroup (scientists), the most important are the names honouring people involved in astronomical research. Only a minor part of the corpus is based on chrematonyms (32 names, 5%), mostly referring to educational institutions, scientific associations, names of observatories and other institutions, and toponyms (28 names, 4%), usually honouring settlements important for the discoverer or for the astronomy itself. Other types of motivations occur exceptionally, and in all such cases, minor planets names are based on common nouns. Keywords: astronomical nomenclature; minor planets; astronyms; anthroponyms; toponyms; chrematonyms; transonymisation; onomastic terminology References Alexander, M. (2016). Astronomical Names. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (pp. 628–635). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.3 Astronomical Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences (2023). Retrieved from https://www.asu.cas.cz/ Avilin, T. (2008). Astronyms in Belarussian Folk Beliefs. Archaeologia Baltica, 10, 29–34. Cabré, T. M. (1998). Terminology. Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Guedes, P., Alves-Martins, F., Arribas, J. M., et al. (2023). Eponyms Have No Place in 21st-century Biological Nomenclature. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 7, 1157–1160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02022-y Holeš, J. (2024a). Vlastní jména osob spojených s českým prostředím v mineralogické nomenklatuře. Acta onomastica, 65(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.58756/a1658736 Holeš, J. (2024b). Použití vlastních jmen v meteorologii. Tradiční, nové a budoucí oblasti zkoumání. Onomastica, 68, 361–376. https://doi.org/10.17651/ONOMAST.68.22 Humbley, J. (2018). La néologie terminologique. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas. IAU 2021 — International Astronomical Union (2021). Rules and guidelines for naming non-cometary small solar-system bodies. IAU WG Small Body Nomenclature. Retrieved from https://www.wgsbn-iau.org IAU 2023a — International Astronomical Union (2023a). Retrieved from https://www.iau.org IAU 2023b — International Astronomical Union (2023b). WG Small Bodies Nomenclature. Retrieved from https://www.wgsbn-iau.org Jakus-Borkowa, E. (2004). Polskie nazewnictwo kosmiczne. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski. Jakus-Borkowa, E. (2006). Semantyka i struktura polskich kosmonimów ludowych. Acta Onomastica, 47, 244–251. Jakus-Borkowa, E. (2007). Charakterystyka polskich chrematonimów kosmicznych. Acta Onomastica, 48, 54–71. Kleť observatory (2023). Database of Minor Planet Names. Retrieved from https://names.klet.org/en Kocourek, R. (1982). La langue française de la technique et de la science. Wiesbaden: Oscar Brandstetter. Lepage, T. (1989). L’astronymie occidentale de la préhistoire à nos jours. In C. de Schaetzen (Ed.), Terminologie diachronique. Actes du colloque organisé à Bruxelles les 25 et 26 mars 1988 (pp. 108–133). Bruxelles: Conseil international de la langue française. Marsden, B. G. (2009). Foreword. In L. D. Schmadel (Auth.), Dictionary of Minor Planet Names. Addendum to Fifth Edition: 2006–2008 (pp. vi–viii). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. MPC — Minor Planet Center (2023). Retrieved from https://www.minorplanetcenter.net NASA (2023). Jet Propulsion Laboratory. California Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://www.jpl.nasa.gov Poulin, R., McDougall, C., & Presswell, B. (2022). What’s in a Name? Taxonomic and Gender Biases in the Etymology of New Species Names. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences, 289, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2708 Rey, A. (1979). La terminologie: noms et notions. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Sager, J. C. (1990). A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.44 Schmadel, L. D. (2009). Dictionary of Minor Planet Names. Addendum to Fifth Edition: 2006–2008. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01965-4 Smith, G. F., & Figueiredo, E. (2022). “Rhodes-” Must Fall: Some of the Consequences of Colonialism for Botany and Plant Nomenclature. Taxon, 71(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12598 Šrámek, R. (1999). Úvod do obecné onomastiky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Tabakovičová, M. (2016). Kosmonymum. In P. Karlík, M. Nekula, & J. Pleskalová (Eds.), Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny I-II (pp. 935–936). Praha: Lidové noviny. Vondráček, M. (1999). Systém pojmenování planetek. In K. Klímová, & H. Kneselová (Eds.), Propria v systému mluvnickém a slovotvorném (pp. 133–138). Brno: Masarykova univerzita. Waniakowa, J. (2021). An Attempt to Systematize Polish Cosmonomastic Terminology. Onomastica, 65(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.17651/ONOMAST.65.2.5 WGSBN (2022). WGSBN Bulletin (Vols. 2.1–16). Retrieved from https://www.wgsbn-iau.org.
|
 |
