2025, Volume 22, Issue 1
|
Valery Leonidovich Vasilyev HYDRONYMIC MARKERS OF CERTAIN WATER-PORTAGE ROUTES OF THE ANCIENT BALTS IN THE AREA OF THE NOVGOROD-PSKOV LANDS
For citation Received on 21 October 2024 Abstract: This article primarily examines the routes used by the ancient Baltic population along rivers, lakes and portages in the historical Novgorod-Pskov lands during the period preceding Slavic colonization. A detailed analysis of Baltic communication routes is preceded by a brief review of the principal water-portage routes employed by medieval Novgorodians. In reconstructing the Slavic travel routes, the following factors are considered: (1) the conditions of the hydrographic network that favored the establishment of water-portage routes; (2) medieval written accounts of water communications; and (3) toponymic evidence. In contrast, reconstructing the ancient Baltic water-land routes is more challenging. With written records no longer available, hydronymy becomes the primary source of evidence, making reliable etymological interpretations of Baltic water names essential. The water routes used by the Balts are indicated by the following markers: (1) the duplication of names for neighbouring yet hydrologically disconnected (different-basin) water features; (2) a chain-like distribution of Baltic hydronyms that is clearly distinct from later Slavic toponymy; and (3) the water-communication semantics inherent in Balticisms. Drawing on the etymologies of substrate names and taking these indicators into account, the author substantiates the existence of a water-portage route Runa — Mizgutnya — Runa, along which the Balts from the Upper Volga lakes area entered the basin of the Pola River. A branch of the Runa route was a path linking the different-basin rivers Polovizma (Polovizna) and Polovizna (Polovizn’). Another Baltic route ran along the contiguous rivers and lakes Pylets — Pylka — Tsevlo — Tsevlа — Polisto — Polista. The Balts also utilized the large rivers Lovat and Shelon, as indicated by the etymology of these hydroonyms. An indirect route along the Netesma River (< Baltic *Netiesum(-a, -as), meaning ‘indirect distance’) enabled the Balts to travel from the Western Dvina to the Volga, offering an alternative to the direct route via Lake Okhvat. Finally, the Balticisms Tisva and Tesova point to movement along straits, equating in meaning to the Slavic hydronym Prost’ and the term prost’ ‘direct route.’ Keywords: Novgorod-Pskov lands; Balts; Slavs; etymology; hydronymy; portages; water communications References Ageeva, R. A. (1989). Gidronimiia Russkogo Severo-Zapada kak istochnik kul’turno-istoricheskoi informatsii [Hydronymy of the Russian Northwest as a Source of Cultural and Historical Information]. Moscow: Nauka. Būga, K. (1961). Rinktiniai raštai (Vol. 3). Vilnius: Valstybinė politinės ir mokslinės literatūros leidykla. Fraenkel, E. (1962). Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (Vols. 1–2). Heidelberg; Göttingen: Carl Winter; Universitätsverlag; Vandenhoeck. Itkonen, E., & Kulonen, U.-M. (Eds.). (1992–2000). Suomen sanojen alkuperä. Etymologinen sanakirja (Vols. 1–3). Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura. Mikhailov, A. V. (1996). K izucheniiu voloka v mezhdurech’e Cherekhi i Uzy [On the Study of the Portage between the Cherekha and Uza Rivers]. In V. V. Sedov (Ed.), Arkheologiia i istoriia Pskova i Pskovskoi zemli [Archaeology and History of Pskov and the Pskov Lands] (pp. 69–73). Pskov: Pskov State Research and Information Centre. Mikhailov, A. V. (1998). Piratstvo na vodnykh putiakh Pskovskoi zemli [Piracy on the Waterways of Pskov Land]. In A. A. Selin (Ed.), Staroladozhskii sbornik [The Staraya Ladoga Collection] (pp. 19–23). St Petersburg; Staraya Ladoga: [s. n.]. Nepokupny, A. P. (1976). Balto-severnoslavianskie iazykovye sviazi [Baltic-North Slavic Language Contacts]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. Nevskaya, L. G. (1977). Baltiiskaia geograficheskaia terminologiia (k semanticheskoi tipologii) [Baltic Geographical Terminology: Towards a Semantic Typology]. Moscow: Nauka. Otkupshchikov, Yu. V. (2006). Ob etimologii gidronima Lovat’ [On the Etymology of the Hydronym Lovat’]. In N. N. Kazansky (Ed.), Indoevropeiskoe iazykoznanie i klassicheskaia filologiia — X [Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology — 10] (pp. 215–219). St Petersburg: Nauka. Pogodin, A. L. (1901). Iz istorii slavianskikh peredvizhenii [From the History of Slavic Migrations]. St Petersburg: A. P. Lopukhin Printing House. Popov, A. I. (1981). Sledy vremen minuvshikh. Iz istorii geograficheskikh nazvanii Leningradskoi, Pskovskoi i Novgorodskoi oblastei [Traces of the Past: From the History of Geographical Names in the Leningrad, Pskov, and Novgorod Regions]. Leningrad: Nauka. Sedov, Vl. V. (2001). Novgorodskaia arkhitektura na Sheloni [Novgorod Architecture on the Shelon River]. Moscow: Society of Architectural Historians. Retrieved from https://archi.ru/files/publications/articles/sed_shelon1.htm Toporov, V. N. (1962). Nekotorye zadachi izucheniia baltiiskoi toponimii russkikh territorii [Some Issues in the Study of Baltic Toponymy in Russian Territories]. In E. M. Murzaev, & V. A. Nikonov (Eds.), Voprosy geografii [Issues in Geography] (Vol. 58, pp. 41–49). Moscow: Geografgiz. Toporov, V. N. (1989). Baltiiskii element v gidronimii Pooch’ia. II [The Baltic Element in the Hydronymy of the Oka River Basin. Part II]. In V. N. Toporov (Ed.), Balto-slavianskie issledovaniia. 1987 [Balto-Slavic Studies, 1987] (pp. 47–69). Moscow: Nauka. Toporov, V. N. (1995). O severo-zapadnom lokuse baltiiskoi gidronimii (iz tsikla “Po okrainam drevnei Baltii”) [On the Northwestern Locus of Baltic Hydronymy (From the Cycle “On the Outskirts of Ancient Baltia”)]. Res Balticae, 1, 13–40. Toporov, V. N. (2001). K voprosu o “novgorodsko-litovskom” prostranstve i ego iazykovoi kharakteristike (po materialam XIII–XV vekov) [On the “Novgorod-Lithuanian” Space and Its Linguistic Features (Based on 13th–15th Century Materials)]. Res Balticae, 7, 7–22. Trubachev, O. N. (1997/2005). V poiskakh edinstva. Vzgliad filologa na problemu istokov Rusi [In Search of Unity: A Philologist’s Perspective on the Origins of Rus’]. Moscow: Nauka. Trubachev, O. N., Zhuravlev, A. F., & Varbot, Zh. Zh. (Eds.). (1974–). Etimologicheskii slovar’ slavianskikh iazykov [Etymological Dictionary of Slavic Languages] (Vols. 1–). Moscow: Nauka. Vanagas, A. (1970). Lietuvos TSR hidronimų daryba [Formation of Hydronyms in the Lithuanian SSR]. Vilnius: Leidykla Mintis. Vasilyev, V. L. (2015). Problematika izucheniia gidronimii baltiiskogo proiskhozhdeniia na territorii Rossii [Issues in the Study of Baltic Hydronymy of Russia]. In S. Torkar (Ed.), Linguistica LV. Slovanski jeziki v stiku z neslovanskimi: diahroni onomastični pogled (pp. 173–186). Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete. Vasilyev, V. L. (2023a). Etimologicheskie zametki po gidronimii Russkogo Severo-Zapada [Etymological Notes on the Hydronymy of the Russian Northwest]. In I. E. Kim (Ed.), Etimologiia kak obraz zhizni: kollektivnaia monografiia k 70-letiiu akademika A. E. Anikina [Etymology as a Way of Life: For the 70th Birthday of Academician A. E. Anikin] (pp. 166–178). St Petersburg: Aleteiia. Vasilyev, V. L. (2023b). Etimologicheskie nabliudeniia nad onomastikoi novgorodskikh berestianykh gramot [Etymological Observations on the Onomastics of Novgorod Birch Bark Documents]. In F. B. Uspenskij (Ed.), Ot sorochka k Olekshe: sbornik statei k 60-letiiu A. A. Gippiusa [From Sorochka to Oleksha: Collected Articles for the 60th Birthday of A. A. Gippius] (pp. 186–194). Moscow: Delo. Yanin, V. L. (2004). Srednevekovyi Novgorod: Ocherki arkheologii i istorii [Medieval Novgorod: Essays on Archaeology and History]. Moscow: Nauka. Zaliznyak, A. A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskii dialekt [The Old Novgorod Dialect] (2nd ed.). Moscow: Iazyki slavianskoi kul’tury.
|
 |
